Alternative therapies for localized prostate cancer

被引:13
作者
Harrie P. Beerlage
机构
[1] Department of Urology, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, PO Box 90153, ME’s-Hertogenbosch
关键词
Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia; Localize Prostate Cancer; Prostate Cancer; Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; Radical Prostatectomy;
D O I
10.1007/s11934-003-0072-5
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Prostate cancer is the leading malignancy in men; an increase in detected localized prostate cancers is expected in the years to come. Radical prostatectomy, although effective, is associated with a considerable morbidity. The aim of minimal invasive alternative treatment options should be equal efficacy, but a decrease in side effects. Cryosurgical ablation of the prostate, brachytherapy, high-intensity focused ultrasound, and radiofrequency interstitial tumor ablation were evaluated after a literature review from a MEDLINE search (1966-2002). When compared with treatments in the 1960s and 1970s, increased safety is observed in all of the alternative treatments available today. Sophisticated technology, including the latest ultrasonography devices for exact planning and monitoring of treatment, contributes largely to this safety. Five-year results of cryosurgical ablation of the prostate show a prostate-specific antigen lower than 1 ng/ mL in 60% of the cases; in the third generation, there are no long-term data available on cryosurgical ablation of the prostate. Recent outcome data of brachytherapy come close to results of radical prostatectomy series. Brachytherapy is the only true alternative at this point in time. Highintensity focused ultrasound and radiofrequency interstitial tumor ablation are promising new technologies that have proven to be able to induce extensive necrosis; however, follow-up is too short to determine their definite places in the treatment of prostate cancer. © 2003, Current Science Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:216 / 220
页数:4
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]  
Catalona W.J., Bigg S.W., Nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: evaluation of results after 250 patients, J Urol, 143, pp. 538-543, (1990)
[2]  
Frohmuller H., Theiss M., Wirth M.P., Radical prostatectomy for carcinoma of the prostate: long-term follow-up of 115 patients, Eur Urol, 19, pp. 279-283, (1991)
[3]  
Walsh P.C., Radical prostatectomy, preservation of sexual function, cancer control: the controversy, Urol Clin North Am, 14, pp. 663-673, (1987)
[4]  
Paulson D.F., Radiotherapy versus surgery for localized prostatic cancer, Urol Clin North Am, 14, pp. 675-684, (1987)
[5]  
Gonder M.J., Soanes W.A., Shulman S., Cryosurgical treatment of the prostate, Invest Urol, 3, pp. 372-378, (1966)
[6]  
Mack D., Jungwirth A., Adam U., Et al., Long-term follow-up after open perineal cryotherapy in patients with locally confined prostate cancer, Eur Urol, 32, pp. 129-132, (1997)
[7]  
Onik G., Cobb C., Cohen J., Et al., US characteristics of frozen prostate, Radiology, 168, pp. 629-631, (1988)
[8]  
Zippe C.D., Cryosurgery of the prostate: techniques and pitfalls, Urol Clin North Am, 23, pp. 147-163, (1996)
[9]  
Cohen J.K., Miller R.J., Rooker G.M., Shuman B.A., Cryosurgical ablation of the prostate: two-year prostate-specific antigen and biopsy results, Urology, 47, pp. 395-401, (1996)
[10]  
Cohen J.K., Miller R.J., Benoit R., Et al., Five-year outcome of PSA and biopsy following cryosurgery as primary treatment for localized prostate cancer, J Urol, 159, (1998)