The J-curve in hypertension

被引:29
作者
John Cruickshank
机构
[1] Suffold CO10 9DE, 42 Harefield, Long Melford
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Coronary Heart Disease; Diastolic Blood Pressure; Coronary Flow Reserve; Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial; Coronary Pressure;
D O I
10.1007/s11886-003-0105-1
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The J-curve debate has continued for 25 years. Dependency upon observational and retrospective studies has confused the issue; only the full publication of data from the prospective, randomized Hypertension Optimal Treatment (HOT) study has thrown genuine light on the problem. Many examples of the J-curve relationship between blood pressure and cardiovascular/noncardiovascular events are due to reverse causality, where underlying disease (eg, poor left ventricular function, poor general health, poorly compliant/stiff arteries) is the cause of both the low blood pressure and the increased risk of both cardiovascular and noncardiovascular events. The J-curve in patients with stiff arteries (wide pulse pressure) may be exacerbated by treatment. From the full publication of the HOT study database it is now reasonable to conclude that for nonischemic hypertensive subjects the therapeutic lowering of diastolic blood pressure (DBP) to the low 80s mm Hg is beneficial, but it is safe (though unproductive) to go lower. However, in the presence of coronary artery disease (limited coronary flow reserve) there is a J-curve relationship between treated DBP and myocardial infarction, but not for stroke. In such high-risk (for myocardial infarction) cases it would be prudent to avoid lowering DBP to below the low 80s mm Hg. Copyright © 2003 by Current Science Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:441 / 452
页数:11
相关论文
共 91 条
[1]  
Lew E.A., High blood pressure, other risk factors and longevity: The insurance viewpoint, Am. J. Med., 35, pp. 281-294, (1973)
[2]  
McMahon S., Peto R., Curler J., Et al., Blood pressure, stroke, and coronary heart disease. Part 1. Prolonged differences in blood pressure: Prospective observational studies corrected for the regression dilution bias, Lancet, 335, pp. 765-774, (1990)
[3]  
Age-specific relevance of usual blood pressure to vascular mortality: A meta-analyses of individual data for one million adults in 61 prospective studies, Lancet, 360, pp. 1903-1913, (2002)
[4]  
Anderson T.W., Re-examination of some of the Framingham blood pressure data, Lancet, 2, pp. 1139-1141, (1978)
[5]  
Stewart I.M., Relation of reduction in pressure to first myocardial infarction in patients receiving treatment for severe hypertension, Lancet, 1, pp. 861-865, (1979)
[6]  
Green K.G., Optimised blood pressure, Lancet, 2, (1979)
[7]  
Strandgaard S., Haunso S., Why does anti-hypertensive treatment prevent stroke but not myocardial infarction, Lancet, 2, pp. 658-661, (1987)
[8]  
Strandgaard S., Autoregulation of cerebral blood flow in hypertensive patients. The modifying influence of prolonged antihypertensive treatment on the tolerance to acute, drug-induced hypotension, Circulation, 53, pp. 720-727, (1976)
[9]  
Romero J.C., Ruilhope L.M., Bentley M.D., Et al., Comparison of the effects of calcium antagonists and converting enzyme inhibitors on renal function under normal and hypertensive conditions, Am. J. Cardiol., 62, (1988)
[10]  
Hricik D.E., Browning P.J., Kopelman R., Et al., Captopril - Induced functional renal insufficiency in patients with bilateral renal-artery stenosis, New. Engl. J. Med., 308, pp. 373-376, (1983)