Wildlife conservation in urban greenways of the mid-southeastern United States

被引:29
作者
Andrew Schiller
Sally P. Horn
机构
[1] University of Tennessee,Department of Geography
关键词
wildlife; greenways; conservation; corridors; urban landscapes; deer; fox;
D O I
10.1023/A:1018515309254
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Goals related to wildlife conservation are stated or implied in many urban greenway plans, but the actual wildlife conservation value of urban greenways is unclear. We surveyed 72 km. of greenway consisting of 38 different greenway segments in six cities in the mid-southeastern United States to determine the presence or absence of red fox (Vulpes vulpes), grey fox (Urocyon cinereoargenteus), and white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus), and to assess characteristics of the greenways and adjacent lands that might promote or limit the presence of these species in each greenway. We focused on fox and deer because these mammals, while habitat generalists, require diverse habitats within close proximity, and are more sensitive to human disturbance and have larger territories than the majority of urban wildlife in this region. Thus, they can serve as indicator species for these habitat values in urban greenways in the southeastern United States. Field observations and scent station inventories revealed that only 18 of the 38 greenway segments had either fox or deer, 12 had only fox, 6 had fox and deer, and none had deer alone. Greenway segments with more forest cover, wider corridors, greater amounts of adjacent natural or seminatural habitat, and forest connectivity between greenways and nonadjacent natural areas were more likely to have fox or deer present. Characteristics associated with fox and deer presence were not independent of each other. Because greenways with such characteristics tend to be surrounded by less urban areas, adjacent land use is a good predictor of fox and deer presence in the surveyed greenways. Whether greenways that are beneficial to fox and deer can be developed in urban settings is strongly site specific, because the greenway variables that appear most essential to these species are often dictated by the preexisting urban form and the vegetation in the vicinity of the greenway. Because the wildlife conservation value of urban greenways depends greatly on factors external to the greenway, greenways that have fox and deer present today may be particularly vulnerable to future changes in surrounding land use.
引用
收藏
页码:103 / 116
页数:13
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [1] Davis A. M.(1978)Urban ecosystems and island biogeography Environ. Conserv. 5 299-304
  • [2] Glick T. F.(1976)Island biogeography and conservation: strategy and limitations Science 193 1027-1032
  • [3] Diamond J. M.(1987)Habitat fragmentation and vertebrate species richness in an urban environment J. Appl. Ecol. 24 337-351
  • [4] Dickman C. R.(1985)Habitat patch connectivity and population survival Ecology 66 1762-1768
  • [5] Fahrig L.(1970)A radiotelemetric study of spatial relationships in the opossum Am. Midl. Nat. 48 170-186
  • [6] Merriam G.(1960)Movements and home range of the gray squirrel Ecology 41 365-369
  • [7] Fitch H. S.(1981)Peninsula diversity patterns Am. Nat. 118 291-296
  • [8] Shirer H. W.(1981)Forest and wildlife dynamics in the Southeast Trans. Conf. N. A. Wildl. Nat. Res. 45 307-322
  • [9] Flyger V.(1994)Ecology of greenways: design and function of linear conservation areas Conserv.Biol 8 603-605
  • [10] Gilpin M. E.(1981)Island biogeography theory and nature reserve design J. Biogeogr. 8 117-124