Colonist farmers' perceptions of fertility and the frontier environment in eastern Amazonia

被引:21
作者
Muchagata M. [1 ,4 ,5 ,6 ,7 ]
Brown K. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,7 ]
机构
[1] School of Development Studies, Overseas Development Group, University of East Anglia, Norwich
[2] School of Development Studies, University of East Anglia
[3] CSERGE, University of East Anglia
[4] Overseas Development Group, University of East Anglia, Norwich
[5] School of Development Studies, University of East Anglia, Norwich
[6] Laboratório Sócio-Agronômico do Tocantins, University of Para
[7] School of Development Studies, Overseas Development Group, University of East Anglia, Norwich
关键词
Amazonia; Farming systems; Local knowledge; Nutrient cycles; Soil fertility;
D O I
10.1023/A:1026531913099
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Colonists, unlike indigenous peoples, are often assumed to have little knowledge of their environment. However, their perceptions of the environment and their knowledge of natural resource systems have a significant impact on their farming practices. Farmers in the frontier region of Marabá, Eastern Amazonia, understand nutrient cycling and the links between different components in farming systems. Diagrams drawn by farmers show very diversified systems, and farmers' knowledge of soil characteristics, including sub-surface features, and distribution in their localities is very detailed in comparison to pedological classifications. However, knowledge about nutrient cycling is very uneven, even between farmers from the same area. Generally, farmers were found to have very detailed knowledge of environmental resources, but very patchy knowledge of processes and functions underlying systems, and this conforms to evolutionary models of ecological knowledge. Perceptions of change in soil fertility are related to the length of settlement, and are closely linked to the presence of forest. Overall, the majority of farmers believe they will not be able to sustain cropping in the future, and as forest and fallow become scarce the most feasible option will be for them to move to other areas. Farmers are more optimistic about pasture, which is viewed as a more stable system, with the key to long-term sustainability being weed control. These findings imply that a high degree of information sharing between farmers and scientists is required to establish resource management strategies and social institutions to support sustainable development strategies at the frontier. © 2000 Kluwer Academic Publishers.
引用
收藏
页码:371 / 384
页数:13
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] Agarwal A., Dismantling the divide between indigenous and scientific knowledge, Development and Change, 26, pp. 413-439, (1995)
  • [2] Amanor K.S., The New Frontier. Farmers' Response to Land Degradation. A West African Study, 244 edition, (1994)
  • [3] Becker B., Undoing myths: The Amazon, an urbanised forest, Brazilian Perspectives on Sustainable Development of the Amazon Region, pp. 53-89, (1995)
  • [4] Bell S., Morse S., Sustainability Indicators. Measuring the Immeasurable, (1999)
  • [5] Berkes F., Sacred Ecology: Traditional Ecological Knowledge and Resource Management, (1999)
  • [6] Blaikie P., Brown K., Dixon P., Sillitoe P., Stocking M., Tang L., Knowledge in action: Local knowledge as a development resource and barriers to its incorporation in natural resource research and development, Agricultural Systems, 55, 2, pp. 217-237, (1997)
  • [7] Indigenous Knowledge Systems and Development, (1980)
  • [8] Brown K., Muchagata M., Modelling the Sustainability of Frontier Farming at the Forest Fringe, (1999)
  • [9] Buschbacher R., Uhl C., Serrao E.A.S., Abandoned pastures in Eastern Amazonia. II Nutrients stocks in the soil and vegetation, Journal of Ecology, 76, pp. 682-699, (1988)
  • [10] Correa J.C., Reichardt K., Efeito do Tempo de Uso das Pastagens Sobre as Propriedades de um Latossolo Amarelo da Amazônia Central, Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, 30, pp. 107-114, (1995)