Wavefront analysis for the diagnosis of subclinical keratoconus

被引:9
作者
Bühren J. [1 ,2 ]
Kühne C. [2 ]
Kohnen T. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Department of Ophthalmology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY
[2] Cullen Eye Institute, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
[3] Klinik für Augenheilkunde, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität, Frankfurt am Main
[4] Klinik für Augenheilkunde, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität, 60590 Frankfurt am Main
来源
Der Ophthalmologe | 2006年 / 103卷 / 9期
关键词
Aberrations; Iatrogenic keratectasia; Keratoconus; Keratoconus suspect; Wavefront analysis;
D O I
10.1007/s00347-006-1394-8
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background. The entity of subclinical keratoconus (SKC) has not been defined sufficiently yet. The aim of the study was to describe ocular wavefront aberrations of clinically inconspicuous fellow eyes in patients with early keratoconus (KC) as a model of SKC and to assess the feasibility of higher-order wavefront analysis to discriminate eyes with SKC from normal eyes. Methods. This prospective study included eight clinically inconspicuous fellow eyes of eight patients with newly detected KC in the contralateral eye and a paracentral inferior-superior difference (PISD) <1.4 D. In total, 15 eyes of 12 patients with newly diagnosed KC and a PISD >1.4 D were included as positive controls and 71 healthy eyes of 40 patients served as negative controls. The wavefront error was measured in all eyes with a Hartmann-Shack sensor. Discriminant analysis was performed with input from ocular HOA data and PISD. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted for PISD, single Zernike coefficients, and for the output values of the discriminant functions to investigate their usefulness for discrimination between SKC eyes, early KC eyes, and healthy controls. Results. There were significant differences between inconspicuous fellow eyes (group 2) and controls (group 3) for PISD, for the coefficients Z3 -3 , Z3 -1 , Z4 0 and Z5 -1, and for the output values of the discriminant functions. The latter discriminated between groups 2 and 3 with maximum sensitivity and specificity (A z ROC=1), whereas discriminative ability was considerably lower for single Zernike coefficients. Conclusion. Single Zernike coefficients did not appear to be useful for the detection of SKC. Using discriminant analysis, from PISD and higher-order Zernike coefficients a metric with very high discriminative ability between normal and SKC eyes could be constructed. © 2006 Springer Medizin Verlag.
引用
收藏
页码:783 / 790
页数:7
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]
Amoils S.P., Deist M.B., Gous P., Et al., Iatrogenic keratectasia after laser in situ keratomileusis for less than -4.0 to -7.0 diopters of myopia, J Cataract Refract Surg, 26, pp. 967-977, (2000)
[2]
Applegate R.A., Hilmantel G., Howland H.C., Et al., Corneal first surface optical aberrations and visual performance, J Refract Surg, 16, pp. 507-514, (2000)
[3]
Binder P.S., Lindstrom R.L., Stulting R.D., Et al., Keratoconus and corneal ectasia after LASIK, J Cataract Refract Surg, 31, pp. 2035-2038, (2005)
[4]
Buhren J., Kuhne C., Kohnen T., Defining Subclinical Keratoconus Using Corneal First-surface Aberrations, (2006)
[5]
Comaish I.F., Lawless M.A., Progressive post-LASIK keratectasia: Biomechanical instability or chronic disease process?, J Cataract Refract Surg, 28, pp. 2206-2213, (2002)
[6]
Gobbe M., Guillon M., Corneal wavefront aberration measurements to detect keratoconus patients, Cont Lens Anterior Eye, 28, pp. 57-66, (2005)
[7]
Kohnen T., Buhren J., Kuhne C., Et al., Wavefront-guided LASIK with the Zyoptix 3.1 system for the correction of myopia and compound myopic astigmatism with 1-year follow-up: Clinical outcome and change in higher order aberrations, Ophthalmology, 111, pp. 2175-2185, (2004)
[8]
Langenbucher A., Gusek-Schneider G.C., Kus M.M., Et al., Keratokonus-Screening mit Wellenfront-parametern auf der Basis topographischer Hornhautdaten, Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd, 214, pp. 217-223, (1999)
[9]
Levy D., Hutchings H., Rouland J.F., Et al., Videokeratographic anomalies in familial keratoconus, Ophthalmology, 111, pp. 867-874, (2004)
[10]
Maeda N., Klyce S.D., Smolek M.K., Comparison of methods for detecting keratoconus using videokeratography, Arch Ophthalmol, 113, pp. 870-874, (1995)