Lack of agreement between bioimpedance and continuous thermodilution measurement of cardiac output in intensive care unit patients

[1] Soni N(1996)Swan song for the Swan-Ganz catheter? BMJ 313 763-764

[2] Haller M(1995)Evaluation of a new continuous cardiac output monitor in critically ill patients: a prospective criterion standard study. Crit Care Med 25 860-866

[3] Zollner C(1994)Is continuous cardiac output measurement using thermodilution reliable in the critically ill patient? Crit Care Med 22 1913-1918

[4] Briegel J(1995)Continuous versus bolus thermodilution cardiac output measurements — a comparative study. Crit Care Med 23 944-949

[5] Forst H(1986)Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet I 370-310

[6] Boldt J(1997)Raising the standard of hemodynamic monitoring: targeting the practice or the practitioner? Crit Care Med 25 209-211

[7] Menges T(1996)Comparison of impedance cardiography with thermodilution and direct Fick methods for noninvasive measurement of stroke volume and cardiac output during incremental exercise in patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol 77 1293-1301

[8] Wollbruck M(1994)Multicenter trial of a new thoracic electrical bioimpedance device for cardiac output estimation. Crit Care med 22 1907-1912

[9] Hammermann H(1993)Comparison of thoracic electrical bioimpedance and thermodilution for the measurement of cardiac index in patients with severe sepsis. Br J Anaesth 70 58-62

[10] Hemplemann G(1993)Thoracic electrical bioimpedance measurement of cardiac output — Not ready for prime time. Crit Care Med 21 1111-1112

[1] Soni N(1996)Swan song for the Swan-Ganz catheter? BMJ 313 763-764

[2] Haller M(1995)Evaluation of a new continuous cardiac output monitor in critically ill patients: a prospective criterion standard study. Crit Care Med 25 860-866

[3] Zollner C(1994)Is continuous cardiac output measurement using thermodilution reliable in the critically ill patient? Crit Care Med 22 1913-1918

[4] Briegel J(1995)Continuous versus bolus thermodilution cardiac output measurements — a comparative study. Crit Care Med 23 944-949

[5] Forst H(1986)Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet I 370-310

[6] Boldt J(1997)Raising the standard of hemodynamic monitoring: targeting the practice or the practitioner? Crit Care Med 25 209-211

[7] Menges T(1996)Comparison of impedance cardiography with thermodilution and direct Fick methods for noninvasive measurement of stroke volume and cardiac output during incremental exercise in patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol 77 1293-1301

[8] Wollbruck M(1994)Multicenter trial of a new thoracic electrical bioimpedance device for cardiac output estimation. Crit Care med 22 1907-1912

[9] Hammermann H(1993)Comparison of thoracic electrical bioimpedance and thermodilution for the measurement of cardiac index in patients with severe sepsis. Br J Anaesth 70 58-62

[10] Hemplemann G(1993)Thoracic electrical bioimpedance measurement of cardiac output — Not ready for prime time. Crit Care Med 21 1111-1112