Treatment of cutaneous T cell lymphoma: Current status and future directions

被引:56
作者
Apisarnthanarax N. [1 ]
Talpur R. [1 ]
Duvic M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Dermatology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Box 434, Houston, TX 77030-4095
关键词
Complete Response Rate; Hypericin; Mycosis Fungoides; Etretinate; Tazarotene;
D O I
10.2165/00128071-200203030-00006
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The treatment of cutaneous T cell lymphoma (CTCL), which includes mycosis fungoides and Sezary syndrome, has been in a state of continual change over recent decades, as new therapies are constantly emerging in the search for more effective treatments for the disease. However, prognosis and survival of patients with CTCL remains dependent upon overall clinical stage (stage IA-IVB) at presentation, as well as response to therapy. Past therapies have been limited by toxicity or the lack of consistently durable responses, and few treatments have been shown to actually alter survival, especially in the late stages of disease. Even aggressive chemotherapy has not been shown to improve overall survival compared to conservative sequential therapy in advanced disease, and adds the risk of immunosuppressive complications. Over the last decade, extracorporeal photopheresis has been the only single treatment that has been shown to improve survival in patients with Sezary syndrome, although its true efficacy and place in combination therapy remain unclear. Much of the focus of current research has been on combinations of skin-directed therapies and biological response modifiers, which improve response rates. The results of various trials over the years have also brought into favor the use of post-remission maintenance therapy with topical corticosteroids, topical mechlorethamine (nitrogen mustard), interferon-α, or phototherapy to prevent disease relapse. Recent novel developments in CTCL therapy include oral bexarotene, a retinoid X receptor-selective retinoid that has activity in all stages of CTCL, and the topical gel formulation of bexarotene, which plays a role in treating localized lesions. US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved, oral systemic bexarotene has the advantage of a 48% overall response rate at a dosage of 300 mg/m2/day, and avoids immunosuppression and risk of central line and catheter-related infectious complications that are associated with other systemic therapies. Monitoring of triglycerides and use of concomitant lipid-lowering agents and thyroid replacement is required in most patients. Also recently FDA-approved, denileukin diftitox is the first of a novel class of fusion toxin proteins and is selective for interleukin-2R (CD25+) T cells, targeting the malignant T cell clones in CTCL. Denileukin diftitox is associated with capillary leak syndrome in 20 to 30% of patients, which may be ameliorated by hydration and corticosteroids. Higher response rates are possible by combining bexarotene with 'statin' drugs and active CTCL therapies. Studies are being conducted on combining bexarotene and denileukin diftitox with other modalities. Biological response modifier therapies that are in current or future investigational trials include topical tazarotene, pegylated interferon, interleukin-2, and interleukin-12. At the forefront of systemic chemotherapy development, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, gemcitabine, and pentostatin appear to have the greatest potential for success in CTCL therapy. Bone marrow transplantation, which is currently limited by the risk of graft-versus-host disease, offers the greatest potential for disease cure. Further developments for CTCL may include more selective immunomodulatory agents, vaccines, and monoclonal antibodies.
引用
收藏
页码:193 / 215
页数:22
相关论文
共 183 条
[1]  
Weinstock M.A., Gardstein B., Twenty-year trends in the reported incidence of mycosis fungoides and associated mortality, Am J Public Health, 89, pp. 1240-1244, (1999)
[2]  
Weinstock M.A., Horm J.W., Mycosis fungoides in the United States: Increasing incidence and description, JAMA, 260, pp. 42-46, (1998)
[3]  
Weinstock M.A., Reynes J.F., The changing survival of patients with mycosis fungoides: A population-based assessment of trends in the United States, Cancer, 85, pp. 208-212, (1999)
[4]  
Abel E.A., Wood G.S., Hoppe R.T., Mycosis fungoides: Clinical and histologic features, staging, evaluation, and approach to treatment, CA Cancer J Clin, 43, pp. 93-115, (1993)
[5]  
Epstein E.H. Jr., Levin D.L., Croft J.D. Jr., Et al., Mycosis fungoides: Survival, prognostic features, response to therapy, and autopsy findings, Medicine (Baltimore), 51, pp. 61-72, (1972)
[6]  
Kim Y.H., Hoppe R.T., Mycosis fungoides and the Sezary syndrome, Semin Oncol, 26, pp. 276-289, (1999)
[7]  
Foss F.M., Sausville E.A., Prognosis and staging of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, Hematol Oncol Clin North Am, 9, pp. 1011-1019, (1995)
[8]  
Kim Y.H., Jensen R.A., Watanabe G.L., Et al., Clinical stage IA (limited patch and plaque) mycosis fungoides: A long-term outcome analysis, Arch Dermatol, 132, pp. 1309-1313, (1996)
[9]  
Kim Y.H., Chow S., Varghese A., Et al., Clinical characteristics and long-term outcome of patients with generalized patch or plaque (T2) mycosis fungoides, Arch Dermatol, 135, pp. 26-32, (1999)
[10]  
Sausville E.A., Eddy J.L., Makuch R.W., Et al., Histopathologic staging at initial diagnosis of mycosis fungoides and the Sezary syndrome: Definition of three distinctive prognostic groups, Ann Intern Med, 109, pp. 372-382, (1988)