Modelling optimal location for pre-hospital helicopter emergency medical services

被引:28
作者
Schuurman N. [1 ]
Bell N.J. [1 ]
L'Heureux R. [2 ]
Hameed S.M. [3 ]
机构
[1] Department of Geography, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby
[2] British Columbia Ambulance Service, Victoria, BC V8W 91
[3] Department of Surgery, University of British Columbia, Trauma Services, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9
关键词
Geographic Information System; Injury Severity Score; Trauma Care; Helicopter Emergency Medical Service; Population Catchment;
D O I
10.1186/1471-227X-9-6
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Increasing the range and scope of early activation/auto launch helicopter emergency medical services (HEMS) may alleviate unnecessary injury mortality that disproportionately affects rural populations. To date, attempts to develop a quantitative framework for the optimal location of HEMS facilities have been absent. Methods: Our analysis used five years of critical care data from tertiary health care facilities, spatial data on origin of transport and accurate road travel time catchments for tertiary centres. A location optimization model was developed to identify where the expansion of HEMS would cover the greatest population among those currently underserved. The protocol was developed using geographic information systems (GIS) to measure populations, distances and accessibility to services. Results: Our model determined Royal Inland Hospital (RIH) was the optimal site for an expanded HEMS - based on denominator population, distance to services and historical usage patterns. Conclusion: GIS based protocols for location of emergency medical resources can provide supportive evidence for allocation decisions - especially when resources are limited. In this study, we were able to demonstrate conclusively that a logical choice exists for location of additional HEMS. This protocol could be extended to location analysis for other emergency and health services. © 2009 Schuurman et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
Trauma System Accreditation Guidelines, (2007)
[2]  
Macpherson A.K., Et al., Urban/rural variation in children's bicycle-related injuries, Accid Anal Prev, 36, 4, pp. 649-654, (2004)
[3]  
Kmet L., Macarthur C., Urban-rural differences in motor vehicle crash fatality and hospitalization rates among children and youth, Accid Anal Prev, 38, 1, pp. 122-127, (2006)
[4]  
Simons R., Injury Control and Trauma Care in Canada: How Well are We Doing?: Trauma Association of Canada Presidential Address, Journal of Trauma, 61, 5, pp. 1027-1035, (2004)
[5]  
Boyd C.R., Corse K.M., Campbell R.C., Emergency interhospital transport of the major trauma patient: Air versus ground, Journal of Trauma, 29, pp. 789-794, (1989)
[6]  
Frankema S.P.G., Et al., Beneficial effect of helicopter emergency medical services on survival of severely injured patients, British Journal of Surgery, 91, 11, pp. 1520-1526, (2004)
[7]  
Mann N.C., Et al., Injury mortality following the loss of air medical support for rural interhospital transport, Academic Emergency Medicine, 9, 7, pp. 694-698, (2002)
[8]  
Urdaneta L.F., Et al., Role of the emergency helicopter transport service in rural trauma, Arch Surg, 122, pp. 992-996, (1987)
[9]  
Oppe S., De Charro F.T., The effect of medical care by a helicopter trauma team on the probability of survival and the quality of life of hospitalised victims, Accident Analysis and Prevention, 33, 1, pp. 129-138, (2001)
[10]  
Wills V.L., Et al., Use of an ambulance-based helicopter retrieval service, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Surgery, 70, 7, pp. 506-510, (2000)