Attachment relationships as predictors of cognitive interpretation and response bias in late adolescence

被引:7
作者
Barrett P.M. [1 ,3 ]
Holmes J. [2 ]
机构
[1] School of Applied Psychology, Griffith University, Brisbane, QLD
[2] School of Applied Psychology, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD
[3] School of Applied Psychology, Faculty of Health Science, Griffith University, Nathan
关键词
Adolescents; Attachment; Cognitive interpretation; Response bias;
D O I
10.1023/A:1016677416638
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
We investigated behavioural and cognitive representations of attachment style. Specifically, we sought to test continuity in attachment style and whether participants' perceptions of their attachments to parents, peers, and romantic partners would predict cognitive interpretation and responses to 12 ambiguous situation scenarios. Participants were 161 undergraduate students (17-20 years) who completed the Parental Bonding Instrument, the Attachment Style Questionnaire and the Inventory of Parent and Peer Attachment (peer subscale). Participants then indicated whether they interpreted ambiguous situations as threatening versus nonthreatening and how they would respond (proactively, aggressively, oravoidantly). Regression analyses revealed that insecure parental attachments were the main predictor of participants' interpretations and their planned responses, followed by romantic attachments. Peer attachments played little role in the predictions. These results suggest that interpretation of situations and subsequent plans of action may be influenced by attachment related experiences. We discuss our findings in terms of their relevance to attachment theory and their application to our understanding of the concepts of attachment in development of interpersonal relationships. © 2001 Human Sciences Press, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:51 / 64
页数:13
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
Armsden G.C., Greenberg M.T., The inventory of parent and peer attachment: Individual differences and their relationship to psychological well-being in adolescence, Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 16, pp. 427-4454, (1987)
[2]  
Barrett P.M., Rapee R.M., Dadds M.R., Ryan S.M., Family enhancement of cognitive style in anxious and aggressive children, Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 24, pp. 187-203, (1996)
[3]  
Blain M.D., Thompson J.M., Whiffen V.E., Attachment and perceived social support in late adolescence: The interaction between working models of self and others, Journal of Adolescent Research, 8, pp. 226-241, (1993)
[4]  
Bowlby J., Attachment and Loss, 2, (1973)
[5]  
Bowlby J., Attachment and Loss, 3, (1981)
[6]  
Bretherton I., Attachment theory: Retrospect and prospect, Monograph for the Society for Research in Child Development, pp. 3-35, (1985)
[7]  
Collins N.L., Read S.J., Adult attachment, working models, and relationship quality in dating couples, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, pp. 644-693, (1990)
[8]  
Feeney J., Noller P., Attachment style as a predictor of adult romantic relationships, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, pp. 281-291, (1990)
[9]  
Feeney J.A., Noller P., Hanraharn M., Assessing Adult Attachment, Attachment in Adults: Clinical and Developmental Perspectives, pp. 128-152, (1994)
[10]  
Gold M., Yanof D.S., Mothers, daughters, and girlfriends, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, pp. 654-659, (1985)