Comparison of five different antibodies in the immunohistochemical assay of estrogen receptor α in human breast cancer

被引:13
作者
Kobayashi S. [1 ]
Ito Y. [1 ]
Ando Y. [2 ]
Omoto Y. [2 ]
Toyama T. [2 ]
Iwase H. [2 ]
机构
[1] Department of Surgery, Higashi Municipal Hospital of Nagoya, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya 464-8547, 1-2-23, Wakamizu
[2] Department of Surgery II, Nagoya City University, Medical School
关键词
Breast Cancer; Estrogen receptor α; Immunohistochemistry;
D O I
10.1007/BF02967445
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Estrogen receptor α(ER) expression is the best prognostic and predictive factor of hormone dependency of human breast cancers. Unlike enzyme immunoassay (EIA), which has been widely used to evaluate ER status in breast cancer, immunohistochemical assay (IHC) can detect ER in a small amounts of tissue with detailed localization. Although there is a sufficient number of ER antibodies against various regions of the protein, the reliability of IHC staining is only well understood for a few. IHC and EIA for the evaluation of the ER status of human breast cancer, therefore, should be compared using the same breast cancer tissues. Methods: Five different ER antibodies (1D-5, C-314, G-20, 0311 and HC-20) that identify different amino acid sequences were used. The evaluation of ER status by IHC using these antibodies was compared with EIA concomitantly in 97 primary human breast cancer tissues. Results: The positivity rate for EIA was 68%. That of IHC for antibodies 1D-5, C-314, G-20, C-311 and HC-20 was 50.5%, 47.4%, 46.4%, 44.3% and 57.7%, respectively. The concordance be~een EIA was 76.3% for 1D-5 and 77.3% for HC-20, which is statistically highly significant (p<0.0001); Other antibodies were not. Conclusions: HC-20 is most suitable in the evaluation of the ER status of human breast cancers using the IHC method. Although antibody 1D-5 is also available, C-314, G20 and C-311 are unreliable in such an evaluation.
引用
收藏
页码:136 / 141
页数:5
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
McGuire W.L., Breast cancer prognostic factors
[2]  
Evaluation guidelines, J Natl Cancer Inst, 83, pp. 154-155, (1991)
[3]  
Systemic treatment of early breast cancer by hormonal, cytotoxic or immune therapy, Lancet, 339, pp. 1-15, (1992)
[4]  
Clinical practice guidelines for the use of tumor markers in breast and colorectal cancer, J Clin Oncol, 14, pp. 2843-2877, (1996)
[5]  
Fisher B., Dignam J., Bryant J., Et al., Five versus more than five years of tamoxffen therapy for breast cancer patients with negative lymph nodes and estrogen receptor-positive tumors, J Natl Cancer Inst, 88, pp. 1526-1542, (1996)
[6]  
Tamoxifen for early breast cancer
[7]  
An overview of the randomised trials, Lancet, 351, pp. 1451-1467, (1998)
[8]  
Frigo B., Pilotti S., Zurrida S., Et al., Analysis of estrogen and progesterone receptors of preoperative fineneedle aspirates, Breast Cancer Res Treat, 33, pp. 179-184, (1995)
[9]  
Barnes D.M., Harris W.H., Smith P., Millis R.R., Rubens R.D., Immunohistochemical determination of oestrogen receptor: Comparison of different methods of assessment of staining and correlation with clinical outcome of breast cancer patients, British Journal of Cancer, 74, 9, pp. 1445-1451, (1996)
[10]  
Golouh R., Vrhovec I., Bracko M., Frkovic-Grazio S., Comparison of standardized immunohistochemical and biochemical assays for estrogen and progesterone receptors in and yeast carcinoma, Pathology Research and Practice, 193, 8, pp. 543-549, (1997)