Evaluating experience with renewables portfolio standards in the United States

被引：6

作者：

Wiser R. ^{[3
]}

Porter K. ^{[1
]}

Grace R. ^{[2
]}

机构：

[1] Exeter Associates, Inc., Columbia, MD 21044

[2] Sustainable Energy Advantage, LLC, Natick, MA 01760

[3] Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, MS 90-4000, Berkeley, CA 94720

来源：

Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change | 2005年 / 10卷 / 2期

关键词：

Energy policy; Policy evaluation; Renewable energy; Renewables portfolio standard; Wind power;

D O I：

10.1007/s11027-005-6573-4

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

Increased use of renewable energy is one of several promising methods for reducing emissions of local, regional, and global air pollutants, including greenhouse gas emissions associated with fossil-fuel based electricity production. Among the available options for encouraging renewable electricity generation, the renewables portfolio standard (RPS) has become especially popular in recent years. The RPS is a newly established policy mechanism, however, and experience with its use has not been widely documented and evaluated. This paper describes and evaluates the design, impacts, and early experience of 13 U.S. state RPS policies. These 13 policies share a common goal of encouraging renewable energy supply, but each specific RPS is designed differently. Our evaluation shows both successes and failures with this policy mechanism; some state RPS policies are positively impacting renewable energy development, while others have been poorly designed and will do little to advance renewable energy markets.We emphasize the importance of policy design details, and specifically highlight critical design pitfalls that have been commonly experienced. Though experience with the RPS is still limited, we have now gained some knowledge of the conditions and design features necessary to make an RPS policy work. An important objective of this article is therefore to identify and describe broad policy design principles and specific best practice design elements that might be used to guide the design of future renewables portfolio standards. © Springer 2005.

引用

页码：237 / 263

页数：26

共 32 条

[1]

Berry T., Jaccard M., The renewable portfolio standard: Design considerations and an implementation survey, Energy Policy, 29, pp. 263-277, (2001)

[2]

Boots M., Green certificates and carbon trading in the Netherlands, Energy Policy, 31, pp. 43-50, (2003)

[3]

Chupka M., Designing effective renewable markets, The Electricity Journal, MAY, pp. 46-57, (2003)

[4]

Clemmer S., Nogee A., Brower M., A Powerful Opportunity: Making Renewable Electricity the Standard, (1999)

[5]

Deyette J., Clemmer S., Donovan D., Plugging in Renewable Energy: Grading the States, (2003)

[6]

Espey S., Renewables portfolio standard: A means for trade with electricity from renewable energy sources?, Energy Policy, 29, pp. 557-566, (2001)

[7]

Fristrup P., Some challenges related to introducing tradable green certificates, Energy Policy, 31, pp. 15-19, (2003)

[8]

Grace R., Wiser R., Crafting a Renewables Portfolio Standard for Rhode Island: Design Choices, Best Practices, and Recommendations, (2003)

[9]

Grace R., Abbanat B., Wiser R., RPSAccounting and Verification Mechanisms and Policy Coordination Report, (2000)

[10]

Haddad B., Jefferiss P., Forging consensus on national renewables policy: The renewables portfolio standard and the national public benefits trust fund, The Electricity Journal, 12, pp. 68-80, (1999)

← 1 2 3 4 →