PHYSIOLOGICAL COSTS OF RECIPROCAL GAIT IN FES ASSISTED WALKING

被引:30
作者
WINCHESTER, P
CAROLLO, JJ
HABASEVICH, R
机构
[1] Mobility Research and Assessment Laboratory, University of Texas, Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
[2] Sigmedics, Inc, Northfield, IL
来源
PARAPLEGIA | 1994年 / 32卷 / 10期
关键词
FUNCTIONAL ELECTRICAL STIMULATION (FES); PARAPLEGIC; GAIT; PHYSIOLOGICAL COST INDEX (PCI);
D O I
10.1038/sc.1994.110
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
This study reports the velocity and physiologic cost index (PCI) of ambulation using a functional electrical stimulation (FES) system for ambulation in paraplegic spinal cord injured subjects. Using established techniques, average velocity and heart rate (HR) were measured on five subjects trained with the Parastep(R) system. PCI was reported for the four subjects who achieved a steady state during ambulation with the Parastep(R) system. It was found that walking performance varied greatly between subjects, and was correlated to frequency of use of the system. Velocity of walking with the Parastep(R) system ranged from 4.6 to 24.3 m/min. In the four subjects where steady state was achieved, PCI ranged from 2.30 to 6.26 beats/m. The average walking speed and PCI were similar to the values reported using alternative mechanical or hybrid systems available to the spinal cord injured for restoration of upright locomotion.
引用
收藏
页码:680 / 686
页数:7
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
Jaeger R.J., Lower Extremity Applications Of Functional Neuromuscular Stimulation, Assist Technol, 4, pp. 19-30, (1992)
[2]  
Campbell J.M., Meadows P.M., Therapeutic FES: From Rehabilitation To Neural Prosthetics, AssistTechnol, 4, pp. 4-18, (1992)
[3]  
Clinkingbeard J.R., Gesten J.W., Hoehn D., Energy Cost Of Ambulation In Traumatic Paraplegic, Am]Phys Med, 43, pp. 157-165, (1964)
[4]  
Chantraine A., Crielaared J.M., Onkelinx A., Pirnay F., Energy Expenditure Of Ambulation InParaplegics: Effects Of Long Term Use Of Bracing, Paraplegia, 22, pp. 173-181, (1984)
[5]  
Waters R.L., Yakura J.S., Adkins R., Barnes G., Determinants Of Gait Performance Following Spinal Cord Injury, Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 70, pp. 811-818, (1989)
[6]  
Douglas R., Larson P.F., D'ambrosia R., McCall R.E., The LSU Reciprocating Gait Orthosis, Orthopedics, 6, pp. 834-838, (1983)
[7]  
Stallard J., Major R.E., Poiner R., Farmer I.R., Jones N., Engineering Design Considerations Of TheORLAU Parawalker And FES Hybrid System, Eng Med, 15, pp. 123-129, (1986)
[8]  
Hirokawa S., Grimm M., Le T., Solomonow M., Baratta R.V., Shoji H., D'ambrosia R.D., EnergyComsumption In Paraplegic Ambulation Using The Reciprocating Gait Orthosis And Electrical Stimulation Of TheThigh Muscles, Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 71, pp. 687-694, (1990)
[9]  
Nene A.V., Patrick J.H., Energy Cost Of Paraplegic Locomotion With The ORLAU Parawalker, Paraplegia, 27, pp. 5-18, (1989)
[10]  
Solomonow M., Baratta R., Hirokawa S., Et al., The RGO Generation II Muscle Stimulation PoweredOrthosis As A Practical Walking System For Thoracic Paraplegics, Orthopedics, 12, pp. L309-L315, (1989)