TREATMENT OUTCOMES FOR TEMPOROMANDIBULAR-JOINT RECONSTRUCTION AFTER PROPLAST-TEFLON IMPLANT FAILURE

被引:122
作者
HENRY, CH
WOLFORD, LM
机构
[1] BAYLOR UNIV, MED CTR, DEPT DENT, ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL SURG SECT, DALLAS, TX USA
[2] BAYLOR COLL DENT, DALLAS, TX 75246 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0278-2391(10)80343-X
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
A retrospective study of 107 patients (male, n = 13; female, n = 94) with 163 joints previously treated with Proplast-Teflon (PT; Vitek, Inc, Houston, TX) implants was performed. The average time in situ for the PT was 59.8 months (range, 2 to 126 months). Average length of follow-up was 84.6 months (range, 59 to 126 months). Only 12% of joints showed no significant osseous changes radiographically. Forty-five patients (42%) continue to have in situ PT implants and 36% of them experience pain that requires medication; 25% have developed an anterior open bite and malocclusion; 9% have limited vertical opening; and 40% are asymptomatic. Temporomandibular joint (TMJ) reconstruction after PT implant failure was performed with five different autologous tissues or a total joint prosthesis. Autologous tissues used to reconstruct the TMJ and the rates of success were as follows: 1) 31% free temporalis fascia and muscle graft with and 13% without sagittal split ramus osteotomy, 2) 8% dermis, 3) 25% conchal cartilage, 4) 12% costochondral grafts, and 5) 21% sternoclavicular grafts. The success rate decreased in all autologous tissue groups as the number of TMJ surgeries performed before reconstruction increased. Ankylosis was the most common cause of failure. Results of TMJ reconstruction with a total joint prosthesis were as follows: 1) 88% functional and occlusal stability of total joint prosthesis; 2) level of pain reduction was rated as 46% good, 38% fair, and 16% poor; and 3) an average interincisal opening of 27 mm at 24 months or less, and 33 mm at 25 months and beyond. A foreign body giant cell reaction was still present an average of 40 months (range, 32 to 48 months) after implant removal and after 4.5 (2 to 9) additional surgeries. Use of a total joint prosthesis may be indicated to achieve successful reconstruction after PT implant failure. © 1993, American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. All rights reserved.. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:352 / 358
页数:7
相关论文
共 70 条
[1]  
ANDERSON JM, 1984, BIOMATERIALS, V5, P5, DOI 10.1016/0142-9612(84)90060-7
[2]  
BEE DE, 1986, J ORAL MAXIL SURG, V44, pM1
[3]   QUANTITATIVE CHARACTERIZATION OF CELLS AT THE INTERFACE OF LONG-TERM IMPLANTS OF SELECTED POLYMERS [J].
BEHLING, CA ;
SPECTOR, M .
JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS RESEARCH, 1986, 20 (05) :653-666
[4]   PERFORATION INTO MIDDLE CRANIAL FOSSA AS A SEQUEL TO USE OF A PROPLAST-TEFLON IMPLANT FOR TEMPOROMANDIBULAR-JOINT RECONSTRUCTION [J].
BERARDUCCI, JP ;
THOMPSON, DA ;
SCHEFFER, RB .
JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1990, 48 (05) :496-498
[5]   RETAINED ALLOPLASTIC TEMPOROMANDIBULAR-JOINT DISK IMPLANTS - A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY [J].
BRONSTEIN, SL .
ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTICS, 1987, 64 (02) :135-145
[6]  
CARTER JB, 1983, 65TH AAOMS ANN M
[7]  
CHRISTENSEN R W, 1964, Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol, V17, P712, DOI 10.1016/0030-4220(64)90522-5
[8]   FOREIGN-BODY REACTION - CHRONIC INFLAMMATORY RESPONSE [J].
COLEMAN, DL ;
KING, RN ;
ANDRADE, JD .
JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS RESEARCH, 1974, 8 (05) :199-211
[9]   TEFLON IMPLANTATION IN TEMPOROMANDIBULAR ARTHROPLASTY [J].
COOK, HP .
ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTICS, 1972, 33 (05) :706-&
[10]  
DUSEK J, 1978, 60TH AAOMS ANN M CHI