THE NATIONAL BIRTH CENTER STUDY .3. INTRAPARTUM AND IMMEDIATE POSTPARTUM AND NEONATAL COMPLICATIONS AND TRANSFERS, POSTPARTUM AND NEONATAL CARE, OUTCOMES, AND CLIENT SATISFACTION

被引:42
作者
ROOKS, JP
WEATHERBY, NL
ERNST, EKM
机构
[1] NATL ASSOC CHILDBEARING CTR,3123 GOTTSCHALL RD,PERKIOMENVILLE,PA 18074
[2] UNIV MIAMI,SCH MED,DEPT EPIDEMIOL & PUBL HLTH,MIAMI,FL 33152
[3] UNIV MIAMI,SCH MED,HLTH SERV RES,MIAMI,FL 33152
来源
JOURNAL OF NURSE-MIDWIFERY | 1992年 / 37卷 / 06期
关键词
D O I
10.1016/0091-2182(92)90122-J
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
This is the final article of the three-part report of the National Birth Center Study. Eight percent of the mothers or infants had serious complications; 16% were transferred, 12% before and 4% after the deliveries. Fifteen percent of transfers were emergencies. Nulliparous women were much more likely than parous women to experience dystocia, be transferred, or have cesarean sections. Seventy-five percent of the nulliparous women gave birth in the centers, compared with 95% of the parous women. Eighty-four percent of the women had at least one postpartum home or office visit There were 11,814 mothers, no maternal deaths, and 15 intrapartum/neonatal deaths (1.3/1,000 births, 0.7 excluding congenital anomalies). Postterm deliveries with macrosomic infants, placental abruption, sustained fetal distress, and thick meconium were associated with high mortality. Mortality was very low for those not transferred and much lower for transfers during labor as compared with those after the delivery. Women with no medical/obstetric risk factors had the lowest rates of transfers and serious complications. Except for postterm pregnancies, the intrapartum/neonatal mortality rate for birth center clients was not higher than rates from studies of low-risk hospital births, and the cesarean section rate was lower. There is no evidence that hospitals are a safer place for low-risk births.
引用
收藏
页码:361 / 397
页数:37
相关论文
共 71 条
[1]   THE USE OF OBSTETRICAL PROCEDURES IN THE CARE OF LOW-RISK WOMEN [J].
ADAMS, JL .
WOMEN & HEALTH, 1983, 8 (01) :25-34
[2]   HOSPITAL SETTING FOR BIRTH AND USE OF MEDICAL PROCEDURES IN LOW-RISK WOMEN [J].
ALBERS, LL ;
SAVITZ, DA .
JOURNAL OF NURSE-MIDWIFERY, 1991, 36 (06) :327-333
[3]  
AMATO JC, 1977, OBSTET GYNECOL, V50, P269
[4]  
Bahry V J, 1989, J Rural Health, V5, P387, DOI 10.1111/j.1748-0361.1989.tb00999.x
[5]  
BENSON RC, 1969, AM J OBSTET GYNECOL, V105, P579
[6]  
BENSON RC, 1965, AM J OBSTET GYNECOL, V91, P645
[7]  
*BLUE CROSS BLUE S, 1978, MAT CTR ASS CHILDB C
[8]   CHARACTERISTICS OF PATIENTS WITH PLACENTA PREVIA AND RESULTS OF EXPECTANT MANAGEMENT [J].
BRENNER, WE ;
EDELMAN, DA ;
HENDRICKS, CH .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1978, 132 (02) :180-191
[9]   EVALUATING THE RISKS OF CESAREAN-SECTION - LOW APGAR SCORE IN REPEAT C-SECTION AND VAGINAL DELIVERIES [J].
BURT, RD ;
VAUGHAN, TL ;
DALING, JR .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1988, 78 (10) :1312-1314
[10]   ASSESSMENT OF THE PROCESS AND OUTCOMES OF THE 1ST 1,000 BIRTHS OF A NURSE-MIDWIFERY SERVICE [J].
CAVERO, CM ;
FULLERTON, JT ;
BARTLOME, JA .
JOURNAL OF NURSE-MIDWIFERY, 1991, 36 (02) :104-110