A DECISION AID FOR REFERRING PATIENTS WITH SYSTOLIC MURMURS FOR ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY

被引:18
作者
FINK, JC [1 ]
SCHMID, CH [1 ]
SELKER, HP [1 ]
机构
[1] TUFTS UNIV NEW ENGLAND MED CTR,DIV CLIN CARE RES,BOSTON,MA 02111
关键词
SYSTOLIC MURMUR; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; DECISION AID; PRIMARY CARE; GENERAL MEDICINE CLINIC; LOGISTIC REGRESSION; ROC CURVE; UTILIZATION; AGE; GENDER;
D O I
10.1007/BF02599215
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: To describe the practice pattern of a group of primary care providers in ordering echocardiography for healthy patients and to derive a decision aid to identify patients with systolic murmurs who have significant cardiac lesions. Design: Retrospective case review of clinical variables, including the demographic, historical, and physical examination features obtained from chart review of the physician evaluation prior to referral for echocardiography and the echocardiographic results, with both univariate and multivariate regression analyses used to identify variables predictive of positive echocardiographic outcomes and to derive a regression model. Setting: General internal medicine clinic in an urban major teaching hospital. Patients/participants: 169 patients between the ages of 18 and 55 years selected retrospectively from medical records. Measurements and main results: Symptoms and auscultatory findings were not predictive of positive echocardiographic outcomes among the patients referred for the test. For the patients who had systolic murmurs, a logistic regression model had three significant predictors of positive echocardiographic results: additional year of age (odds ratio: 1.08, 95% CI: 1.02 - 1.13; p = 0.007); male gender (odds ratio: 5.87, 95% CI: 1.99 - 17.3; p = 0.002); and murmur grade greater than or equal to 3 (odds ratio: 4.99, 95% CI: 1.27 - 19.6; p = 0.02). The receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve area for this model was 0.741. If women aged 35 years and less with murmur grades less than or equal to 2 had not been referred, 47% of the echocardiographies could have been avoided while retaining a sensitivity of 90%. Conclusions: The study suggested that healthy patients with systolic murmurs are least likely to have positive echocardiographic results when they are young and female and have murmur grades less than or equal to 2. More careful screening of this group might make unnecessary almost half of the echocardiographies yielding negative results ordered for healthy patients with systolic murmurs.
引用
收藏
页码:479 / 484
页数:6
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [1] Pollick C., Echocardiography in a district general hospital, Postgrad Med J, 54, pp. 297-301, (1978)
  • [2] Markiewicz W., Peled B., Hammerman H., Greif Z., Jamal H., Riss E., Contribution of M-mode echocardiography to cardiac diagnosis, Am J Med, 65, pp. 803-7, (1978)
  • [3] Esper R., Detection of mild aortic regurgitation by range-gated pulsed Doppler echocardiography, Am J Cardiol, 50, pp. 1037-43, (1982)
  • [4] Abbasi A., Allen M., DeCristofaro D., Ungar I., Detection and estimation of the degree of mitral regurgitation by range-gated pulsed Doppler echocardiography, Circulation, 61, pp. 143-7, (1980)
  • [5] Kinney E., Causes of false negative auscultation of regurgitant lesions: Doppler echocardiographic study of 294 patients, J Gen Intern Med, 3, pp. 429-34, (1988)
  • [6] Hershman W., Moskowitz M., Marton K., Et al., Utility of echocardiography with suspected mitral valve prolapse, Am J Med, 87, pp. 371-5, (1989)
  • [7] Coghlan H., Mitral valve prolapse: is echocardiography yielding too little or too much to the practicing physician?, Am J Med, 87, pp. 367-70, (1989)
  • [8] Xu M., McHaffie D., Nonspecific systolic murmurs: an audit of the clinical value of echocardiography, NZ Med J, 106, pp. 54-6, (1993)
  • [9] Olive K., Grassman E., Mitral valve prolapse: comparison by physical examination and echocardiography, South Med J, 83, pp. 1266-9, (1990)
  • [10] Barron J., Manrose D., Leibson P., Comparison of auscultation with two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiography in patients with suspected mitral valve prolapse, Clin Cardiol, 11, pp. 401-6, (1988)