DEFINITION FOR DEFINITIONS OF LEARNING-DISABILITIES

被引:25
作者
KAVALE, KA
FORNESS, SR
LORSBACH, TC
机构
[1] UNIV CALIF LOS ANGELES,UAF,LOS ANGELES,CA 90024
[2] UNIV NEBRASKA,SPECIAL EDUC,OMAHA,NE 68182
关键词
D O I
10.2307/1510662
中图分类号
G76 [特殊教育];
学科分类号
040109 ;
摘要
This article examines the problem of definition in learning disabilities. First, the focus is on the nature of definition. It is suggested that available definitions of LD are not real in the Aristotelian sense of providing an essence. Rather, they are best viewed as providing stipulative meaning by representing information agreed upon by particular groups. What is stipulated, however, cannot be considered either true or false but only useful for practical purposes. Practice requires operational definitions, which are also fraught with conceptual difficulties. Such difficulties are illustrated in a discussion of discrepancy. It is also suggested that operational definition is too narrowly focused and should be expanded by considering operational interpretations, based on the best available knowledge. Finally, an example is provided of how operational interpretations may be combined into a more comprehensive operational definition for classifying learning disabilities. © 1991, Council for Learning Disabilities. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:257 / 266
页数:10
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]  
ALGOZZINE B, 1982, J SCH PSYCHOL, V20, P298
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1987, ROAD STRUCTURE
[3]  
Aristotle, 1960, TOPICS
[4]  
Benjamin A. C., 1955, OPERATIONISM
[5]  
BERGMANN G, 1961, VALIDATION SCI THEOR, P45
[6]  
Berk R. A., 1982, LEARNING DISABILITIE, V1, P11
[7]  
Blalock Hubert M., 1982, CONCEPTUALIZATION ME
[8]  
BRIDGMAN PG, 1927, LOGIC MODERN PHYSICS
[9]   CURRENT RESEARCH TOPICS IN LEARNING-DISABILITIES [J].
BURSUCK, WD ;
EPSTEIN, MH .
LEARNING DISABILITY QUARTERLY, 1987, 10 (01) :2-7
[10]  
DEEESE J, 1972, PSYCHOL SCI ART