REGIONAL FOREST FRAGMENTATION EFFECTS ON BOTTOMLAND HARDWOOD COMMUNITY TYPES AND RESOURCE VALUES

被引:59
作者
RUDIS, VA
机构
[1] USDA Forest Service, Southern Research Station, Forest Inventory and Analysis Unit, Starkville, 39759, MS
关键词
ANTHROPOGENIC USES; FOREST RESOURCE SURVEYS; FORESTED WETLAND HABITAT; OWNERSHIP; REGIONAL EFFECTS; SOUTHERN UNITED STATES;
D O I
10.1007/BF00128996
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 [生物信息与计算生物学]; 0713 [生态学];
摘要
In human-dominated regions, forest vegetation removal impacts remaining ecosystems but regional-scale biological consequences and resource value changes are not well known. Using forest resource survey data, I examined current bottomland hardwood community types and a range of fragment size classes in the south central United States. Analyses examined resource value indicators, appraised tree-based flood zone and shade tolerance indices, and identified potential regional-scale processes. Findings revealed that the largest fragments had fewer tree species, reduced anthropogenic use evidence, and more older and wetter community types than small fragments. Results also suggested the need for incorporating hydrologic, geomorphic, and understory vegetation parameters in regional forest resource monitoring efforts. Two regional-scale processes are hypothesized: (1) forest fragmentation occurs more frequently in drier habitats and dry zone (inundated less than or equal to 2 months annually), younger seral stage bottomland community types; and (2) forest fragmentation induces establishment of drier habitats or dry zone, younger seral stage community types. Both hypotheses suggest that regional forest fragmentation impacts survival of distinct community types, anthropogenic uses, and multiple resource values.
引用
收藏
页码:291 / 307
页数:17
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]
Burns R.M., Honkala B.H., Burns R.M., Honkala B.H., Summary of tree characteristics, pp. 846-849, (1990)
[2]
Dahl T.E., Wetland losses in the United States 1780's to 1980's, (1990)
[3]
Dunn C.P., Stearns F., Guntenspergen G.R., Sharpe D.M., Ecological benefits of the Conservation Reserve Program, Conservation Biology, 7, 1, pp. 132-139, (1993)
[4]
Fennemann N.M., Physiography of eastern United States, (1938)
[5]
Forest survey inventory work plan: Alabama 1989–1990, (1989)
[6]
Forest service: resource inventories: an overview, (1992)
[7]
Garth R.E., The ecology of Spanish moss (Tillandsia usneoides): its growth and distribution, Ecology, 45, pp. 470-481, (1964)
[8]
Gosselink J.G., Shaffer G.P., Lee L.C., Et al., Landscape conservation in a forested wetland watershed, BioScience, 40, pp. 588-600, (1990)
[9]
Larson J.S., Bedinger M.S., Bryan C.F., Brown S., Huffman R.T., Miller E.L., Rhodes D.G., Touchet B.A., Transition from wetlands to uplands in south-eastern bottomland hardwood forests, Wetlands of bottomland hardwood forests, pp. 225-273, (1981)
[10]
Levenson J.B., Woodlots as biogeographic islands in southeastern Wisconsin, Forest island dynamics in mandominated landscapes, pp. 13-39, (1981)