AN IN-VITRO STUDY OF 2 ADHESIVE SYSTEMS - 3RD AND 4TH GENERATIONS

被引:5
作者
BOUVIER, D
DUPREZ, JP
NGUYEN, D
LISSAC, M
机构
[1] UNIV LYON 1,UFR ODONTOL,DEPT PEDIAT DENT,F-69365 LYON,FRANCE
[2] ECOLE CENT LYON,DEPT MET,ECULLY,FRANCE
[3] UNIV LYON 1,UFR ODONTOL,DEPT DENT BIOMAT,F-69365 LYON,FRANCE
关键词
D O I
10.1016/0109-5641(93)90058-X
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
The aim of this in vitro study was to compare the adhesive properties of a manufacturer's third and fourth generation dentin adhesive. Vestibular sections of recently extracted third molars were embedded in chemical-cured acrylic resin and ground with 600-grit silicon carbide sandpaper, Fifteen samples were prepared with the adhesive products and the dentin surfaces were analysed by SEM. Twenty-four samples were divided into two groups and prepared with third and fourth generation systems, respectively. Composite filled tubes were then positioned on the prepared dentin surfaces and photopolymerized. The treated samples were kept in distilled water at 37 degrees C for 24 h. Four samples were used to analyze the resin-dentin surface. A tension test was performed on the remaining twenty samples at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. The results were analyzed using the Fisher and Student t-tests. The fractured surfaces were examined by SEM. The resistance to tensile forces of specimens prepared with the fourth generation system was significantly higher than that obtained after using the third generation system. Thus, as expected from the in vitro tests, the fourth generation system provided better adhesion to dentin than the third generation material.
引用
收藏
页码:365 / 369
页数:5
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
ATTAL JP, 1991, J BIOMATER, V6, P3
[2]  
BRUDEVOLD F, 1956, J Dent Res, V35, P846, DOI 10.1177/00220345560350060401
[3]   CLINICAL STATUS OF DENTIN BONDING AGENTS [J].
DOUGLAS, WH .
JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 1989, 17 (05) :209-215
[4]  
Duke E S, 1990, Am J Dent, V3, P264
[5]  
Duke E S, 1991, Quintessence Int, V22, P889
[6]  
Erickson R L, 1989, Am J Dent, V2 Spec No, P117
[7]   INFLUENCE OF SELECTED VARIABLES ON ADHESION TESTING [J].
FOWLER, CS ;
SWARTZ, ML ;
MOORE, BK ;
RHODES, BF .
DENTAL MATERIALS, 1992, 8 (04) :265-269
[8]  
GOLDBERG M, 1989, MANUEL HIST BIOL BUC, P58
[9]   AN INVIVO AND INVITRO COMPARISON OF 2 DENTIN BONDING AGENTS [J].
GRAY, SE ;
BURGESS, JO .
DENTAL MATERIALS, 1991, 7 (03) :161-165
[10]  
Kubo S, 1991, J Esthet Dent, V3, P62, DOI 10.1111/j.1708-8240.1991.tb00812.x