WHAT MAKES A GOOD SCIENTIST - DETERMINANTS OF PEER EVALUATION AMONG BIOLOGISTS

被引：59

作者：

SONNERT, G ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] HARVARD UNIV,DEPT PHYS,CAMBRIDGE,MA 02138

来源：

SOCIAL STUDIES OF SCIENCE | 1995年 / 25卷 / 01期

基金：

美国国家科学基金会;

关键词：

D O I：

10.1177/030631295025001003

中图分类号：

N09 [自然科学史]; B [哲学、宗教];

学科分类号：

01 ; 0101 ; 010108 ; 060207 ; 060305 ; 0712 ;

摘要：

This study explores the criteria by which biologists in the United States evaluate their peers' scientific performance. Six distinguished biology professors rated forty-two former National Science Foundation Postdoctoral Fellows on the basis of the latter's CVs and bibliographies. The most powerful predictor of these quality judgements was the rated scientist's annual productivity rate: this explained more than 40% of the variance in the evaluators' judgements.

引用

页码：35 / 55

页数：21

共 40 条

[1] PUBLISH OR POLITIC - REFEREE BIAS IN MANUSCRIPT REVIEW [J].

ABRAMOWITZ, SI ;

GOMES, B ;

ABRAMOWITZ, CV .

JOURNAL OF APPLIED SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1975, 5 (03) :187-200

[2]

[Anonymous], 1979, FAIR SCI WOMEN SCI C

[3] SOME CORRELATES OF A CITATION MEASURE OF PRODUCTIVITY IN SCIENCE [J].

BAYER, AE ;

FOLGER, J .

SOCIOLOGY OF EDUCATION, 1966, 39 (04) :381-390

[4]

CHASE JM, 1970, AM SOCIOL, V25, P262

[5]

CHUBIN DE, 1990, PERLESS SCI PEER REV

[6] THE RELIABILITY OF PEER-REVIEW FOR MANUSCRIPT AND GRANT SUBMISSIONS - A CROSS-DISCIPLINARY INVESTIGATION [J].

CICCHETTI, DV .

BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES, 1991, 14 (01) :119-134

[7]

COHEN JV, 1977, STATISTICAL POWER AN

[8]

COLE J, 1971, AM SOCIOL, V6, P23

[9]

Cole J., 1973, SOCIAL STRATIFICATIO

[10]

Cole J.R., 1984, ADV MOTIVATION ACHIE, V2, P217

← 1 2 3 4 →