EDROPHONIUM PROVOCATIVE TEST IN NONCARDIAC CHEST PAIN - EVALUATION OF TESTING TECHNIQUES

被引:24
作者
DALTON, CB [1 ]
HEWSON, EG [1 ]
CASTELL, DO [1 ]
RICHTER, JE [1 ]
机构
[1] WAKE FOREST UNIV,BOWMAN GRAY SCH MED,DEPT MED,GASTROENTEROL SECT,WINSTON SALEM,NC 27103
关键词
chest pain; diffuse spasm; edrophonium; esophageal motility disorders;
D O I
10.1007/BF01540560
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Edrophonium chloride is used frequently as a provocative agent in the assessment of noncardiac chest pain (NCCP). However, the optimum dose and most appropriate method of interpreting test results is controversial. We studied 150 consecutive NCCP patients and 50 age-matched controls who alternately received either 80 μg/kg or 10 mg intravenous bolus doses of edrophonium preceded by saline placebo injections. Distal esophageal pressures were measured before and after drug injection in response to ten 5-cc wet swallows. Following 10 mg of edrophonium, 33% of patients and 4% of controls reported chest pain, while 29% of patients and no controls receiving the 80 μg/kg dose complained of chest pain. Amplitude changes after either dose were not significantly different for all comparisons, but the duration of response did distinguish the two doses in patients with chest pain. A significantly greater (P=0.01) increase in distal contraction duration occurred after 10 mg (74±12%; ±se) compared to 80 μg/kg dose (43± 6%). However, individual responses to the two doses overlapped considerably. If a positive test is redefined to include both chest pain and manometric changes that are significantly different from controls, the positivity rate changes drastically; 33% to 9% in the 10- mg group and 30% to 3% in the 80- μg/kg group. Side effects were similar between doses, but there was a significant (P=0.02) linear relationship between intensity of side effects and the edrophonium dose per kilogram of body weight. From this study and a review of the literature, we conclude that either dose of edrophonium is appropriate for provocative testing but that the interpretation of results is dependent upon technique. © 1990 Plenum Publishing Corporation.
引用
收藏
页码:1445 / 1451
页数:7
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]
GRADED ESOPHAGEAL BALLOON DISTENSION - A NEW PROVOCATIVE TEST FOR NONCARDIAC CHEST PAIN [J].
BARISH, CF ;
CASTELL, DO ;
RICHTER, JE .
DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 1986, 31 (12) :1292-1298
[2]
BENJAMIN SB, 1983, GASTROENTEROLOGY, V84, P893
[3]
CASE W L, 1989, Gastroenterology, V96, pA76
[4]
EDROPHONIUM TESTING FOR ESOPHAGEAL PAIN - CONCURRENCE AND DISCORD [J].
CASTELL, DO ;
RICHTER, JE .
DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 1987, 32 (08) :897-899
[5]
DODDS WJ, 1973, J APPL PHYSIOL, V35, P851
[6]
FREIDIN N, 1987, GASTROENTEROLOGY MAY
[7]
COMPARISON OF ESOPHAGEAL MANOMETRY, PROVOCATIVE TESTING, AND AMBULATORY MONITORING IN PATIENTS WITH UNEXPLAINED CHEST PAIN [J].
HEWSON, EG ;
DALTON, CB ;
RICHTER, JE .
DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 1990, 35 (03) :302-309
[8]
EFFECT OF DRY SWALLOWS AND WET SWALLOWS OF DIFFERENT VOLUMES ON ESOPHAGEAL PERISTALSIS [J].
HOLLIS, JB ;
CASTELL, DO .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY, 1975, 38 (06) :1161-1164
[9]
EFFECTS OF CHOLINERGIC STIMULATION ON HUMAN ESOPHAGEAL PERISTALSIS [J].
HOLLIS, JB ;
CASTELL, DO .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY, 1976, 40 (01) :40-43
[10]
ESOPHAGEAL CHEST PAIN - VALUE OF HIGH-DOSE PROVOCATIVE TESTING WITH EDROPHONIUM CHLORIDE IN PATIENTS WITH NORMAL ESOPHAGEAL MANOMETRIES [J].
LEE, CA ;
REYNOLDS, JC ;
OUYANG, A ;
BAKER, L ;
COHEN, S .
DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 1987, 32 (07) :682-688