ASYMPTOTIC RESPONSE TO SELECTION ON BEST LINEAR UNBIASED PREDICTORS OF BREEDING VALUES

被引:66
作者
DEKKERS, JCM
机构
[1] Centre for Genetic Improvement of Livestock, Department of Animal and Poultry Science, University of Guelph, Guelph
来源
ANIMAL PRODUCTION | 1992年 / 54卷
关键词
BEST LINEAR UNBIASED PREDICTION; BREEDING VALUE; GENETIC VARIANCE; SELECTION RESPONSES;
D O I
10.1017/S0003356100020808
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Formulas were derived to predict asymptotic response to selection on best linear unbiased predictors (BLUP) of breeding values that account for selection-induced gametic phase disequilibrium, also known as the 'Bulmer' effect. Breeding programmes in populations of infinite size and with discrete generations were considered. For two-path breeding programmes with equal male and female accuracy of selection, relative reductions in response due to gametic phase disequilibrium were independent of heritability. Reductions in response depended only on intensities of selection and ranged from 0.22 to 0.27 when selected proportions were less than 0.4 for both males and females. With unequal accuracy of males and females, relative reductions in response depended on the ratio of accuracies, in addition to selection intensities. For given selection intensities, reductions were up to proportionately 0.08 larger with unequal accuracies than reductions obtained for equal accuracies. Relative reductions in response for breeding programmes with four paths of selection depended on intensity and accuracy of selection in each path, but were within a range similar to that observed for two-path programmes. Gametic phase disequilibrium will, therefore, not greatly affect ranking and relative differences among alternative breeding programmes. Gametic phase disequilibrium had a larger effect on response with selection on BLUP than on phenotype, which is largely due to larger relative reductions in accuracy of selection with BLUP. Despite larger relative reductions, asymptotic response to selection on BLUP is expected to be larger than selection on phenotype.
引用
收藏
页码:351 / 360
页数:10
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
BELONSKY GM, 1988, J ANIM SCI, V66, P1124
[2]   EFFECT OF SELECTION ON GENETIC VARIABILITY [J].
BULMER, MG .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 1971, 105 (943) :201-+
[3]  
Bulmer MG., 1980, MATH THEORY QUANTITA
[4]  
Cochran W. G., 1951, P 2 BERKELEY S MATH, P449
[5]   A SEMI-STOCHASTIC MODEL FOR SIMULATION OF GENETIC-IMPROVEMENT BY COMMERCIAL ARTIFICIAL-INSEMINATION FIRMS IN A LARGE DAIRY-CATTLE POPULATION [J].
DEKKERS, JCM ;
SHOOK, GE .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL BREEDING AND GENETICS, 1990, 107 (05) :321-339
[6]  
DEKKERS JCM, 1990, 4TH P WORLD C GEN AP, V13, P277
[7]  
Falconer D. S., 1989, Introduction to quantitative genetics.
[8]  
FIMLAND E, 1979, Z TIERZ ZUCHTUNGSBIO, V96, P120
[9]   THE EFFECT OF REPEATED CYCLES OF SELECTION ON GENETIC VARIANCE, HERITABILITY, AND RESPONSE [J].
GOMEZRAYA, L ;
BURNSIDE, EB .
THEORETICAL AND APPLIED GENETICS, 1990, 79 (04) :568-574
[10]  
Henderson C. R., 1982, Proceedings of the World Congress on Sheep and Beef Cattle Breeding. Vol. I., P191