INFLUENCE OF LOW OSMOLALITY CONTRAST-MEDIA ON ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY AND HEMODYNAMICS IN CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY - DIFFERENCES BETWEEN AN IONIC (IOXAGLATE) AND A NONIONIC (IOHEXOL) AGENT

被引:9
作者
VIKMO, H [1 ]
FOLLING, M [1 ]
BARTH, P [1 ]
NORDREHAUG, JE [1 ]
BJORKHAUG, A [1 ]
ROSLAND, GA [1 ]
机构
[1] LAB GUERBET,GUERBET,FRANCE
来源
CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR DIAGNOSIS | 1990年 / 21卷 / 04期
关键词
contrast media; electrophysiology; His bundle; iohexol; ioxaglate;
D O I
10.1002/ccd.1810210403
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
It has recently been suggested that the addition of sodium to low osmolality contrast media may reduce the incidence of ventricular fibrillation and conduction disturbances during coronary angiography. In a randomized, double blind study of 30 patients undergoing coronary angiography we therefore examined the electrophysiological and hemodynamic effects of the two low osmolality contrast media—ioxaglate (with sodium) and iohexol (without sodium). Standard ECG, aortic blood pressure, and His bundle electrocardiogram were recorded. The contrast media were well tolerated and no serious arrhythmias were observed. Both induced a transient decrement in systolic blood pressure and reduction in heart rate 10 s following contrast injection (all P<0.01). Ioxaglate prolonged the QT interval at 10 s (P<0.01) and also when analysed for the whole observation period (120 s) (P<0.05), whereas iohexol did not cause any significant changes in the QT‐interval. The AH‐interval was prolonged by ioxaglate at 10 s (P<0.01), but not altered by iohexol. Thus, other factors than osmolality and sodium content might contribute to QT prolongation, since only the contrast agents with sodium (ioxaglate) induced QT prolongation in this study. Copyright © 1990 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:221 / 226
页数:6
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
AHMEN T, 1987, ACTA RADIOL S, V370, P65
[2]  
BAATH L, 1989, ACTA RADIOL, V30, P207
[3]   A STUDY OF DROMOTROPIC EFFECTS OF INTRA-CORONARY ARTERIAL INJECTIONS OF VARIOUS CONTRAST MATERIALS IN ANESTHETIZED DOGS [J].
CHEYMOL, G ;
LAUTROU, J ;
BONNEMAIN, B ;
MAITREPIERRE, MM ;
WEISSENBURGER, J .
INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 1981, 16 (05) :443-448
[4]   COMPLICATIONS OF CORONARY ARTERIOGRAPHY FROM THE COLLABORATIVE STUDY OF CORONARY-ARTERY SURGERY (CASS) [J].
DAVIS, K ;
KENNEDY, JW ;
KEMP, HG ;
JUDKINS, MP ;
GOSSELIN, AJ ;
KILLIP, T .
CIRCULATION, 1979, 59 (06) :1105-1112
[5]   CLINICAL SUPERIORITY OF A NEW NONIONIC CONTRAST AGENT (IOPAMIDOL) FOR CARDIAC ANGIOGRAPHY [J].
GERTZ, EW ;
WISNESKI, JA ;
CHIU, D ;
AKIN, JR ;
HU, C .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 1985, 5 (02) :250-258
[6]  
GWORT J, 1982, CATHET CARDIOVASC DI, V8, P13
[7]   USE OF CONVENTIONAL AND NEWER RADIOGRAPHIC CONTRAST AGENTS IN CARDIAC ANGIOGRAPHY [J].
HANLEY, PC ;
HOLMES, DR ;
JULSRUD, PR ;
SMITH, HC .
PROGRESS IN CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES, 1986, 28 (06) :435-448
[8]  
HAYAKAWA K, 1988, INVEST RADIOL S1, V23, P144
[9]  
Higgins C B, 1983, Acta Radiol Suppl, V366, P111
[10]   HEMODYNAMIC-CHANGES INDUCED BY CARDIAC ANGIOGRAPHY WITH IOXAGLATE - COMPARISON WITH DIATRIZOATE [J].
HIRSHFELD, JW ;
LASKEY, W ;
MATIN, JL ;
GROH, WC ;
UNTEREKER, W ;
WOLF, GL .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 1983, 2 (05) :954-957