A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL OF CHRONIC VAGUS NERVE-STIMULATION FOR TREATMENT OF MEDICALLY INTRACTABLE SEIZURES

被引:470
作者
GEORGE, R
SONNEN, A
UPTON, A
SALINSKY, M
RISTANOVIC, R
BERGEN, D
MIRZA, W
ROSENFELD, W
NARITOKU, D
MANONESPAILLAT, R
BAROLAT, G
WILLIS, J
STEFAN, H
TREIG, T
HUFNAGEL, A
KUZNIECKY, R
UTHMAN, B
WILDER, BJ
AUGUSTINSSON, L
BENMENACHEM, E
RAMSAY, E
WERNICKE, JF
TARVER, WB
机构
[1] OREGON HLTH SCI UNIV,CTR EPILEPSY CDW3,PORTLAND,OR 97201
[2] BAYLOR COLL MED,HOUSTON,TX 77030
[3] HANS BERGER KLIN,BREDA,NETHERLANDS
[4] MCMASTER UNIV,HAMILTON,ON,CANADA
[5] RUSH PRESBYTERIAN ST LUKES MED CTR,CHICAGO,IL 60612
[6] ST LOUIS UNIV,ST LOUIS,MO 63103
[7] ST LUKES HOSP,ST LOUIS,MO
[8] SO ILLINOIS UNIV,SPRINGFIELD,IL
[9] TEMPLE UNIV,PHILADELPHIA,PA 19122
[10] THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIV,PHILADELPHIA,PA 19107
[11] TULANE UNIV,NEW ORLEANS,LA 70118
[12] UNIV ERLANGEN NURNBERG,W-8520 ERLANGEN,GERMANY
[13] UNIV KLIN BONN,BONN,GERMANY
[14] UNIV ALABAMA,BIRMINGHAM,AL
[15] UNIV FLORIDA,GAINESVILLE,FL
[16] GOTHENBURG UNIV,GOTHENBURG,SWEDEN
[17] UNIV MIAMI,MIAMI,FL 33152
[18] CYBERON INC,WEBSTER,TX
关键词
D O I
10.1212/wnl.45.2.224
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Preliminary reports have suggested that chronic, intermittent stimulation of the vagus nerve (VNS) is an alternative treatment for patients with medically refractory seizures. We performed a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of adjunctive VNS in patients with poorly controlled partial seizures. An implanted, programmable pacemaker-like device was connected to two stimulating electrodes wrapped around the left vagus nerve. One hundred fourteen patients were randomized to receive 14 weeks of high-level stimulation (presumed therapeutic dose) or low-level stimulation (presumed subtherapeutic dose) using a blinded, parallel study design. Seizure frequency was compared with a 12-week baseline. Mean reduction in seizure frequency was 24.5% for the ''high'' stimulation group versus 6.1% for the ''low'' stimulation group (p = 0.01). Thirty-one percent of patients receiving high stimulation had a seizure frequency reduction of greater than or equal to 50%, versus 13% of patients in the low group (p = 0.02). Treatment emergent side effects were largely limited to a transient hoarseness occurring during the stimulation train. One patient with no previous history of cardiac disease experienced a myocardial infarction during the third month of vagal stimulation. VNS may be an effective alternative treatment for patients who have failed antiepileptic drug therapy and are not optimal candidates for epilepsy surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:224 / 230
页数:7
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1981, EPILEPSIA, V22, P489
[2]   CORTICAL AND SUBCORTICAL EEG PATTERNS OF RESPONSE TO AFFERENT ABDOMINAL VAGAL STIMULATION - NEUROGRAPHIC CORRELATES [J].
CHASE, MH ;
NAKAMURA, Y .
PHYSIOLOGY & BEHAVIOR, 1968, 3 (05) :605-&
[3]  
CHASE MICHAEL H., 1967, BRAIN RES, V5, P236, DOI 10.1016/0006-8993(67)90089-3
[4]   CHRONIC CEREBELLAR STIMULATION IN EPILEPSY [J].
COOPER, IS ;
AMIN, I ;
RIKLAN, M ;
WALTZ, JM ;
POON, TP .
ARCHIVES OF NEUROLOGY, 1976, 33 (08) :559-570
[5]  
Fisher Robert D., 1993, P549
[6]  
FISHER RS, 1991, EPILEPSIA, V33, P841
[7]  
FRENCH J, 1993, NEUROLOGY, V43, pA307
[8]   ELECTROPHYSIOLOGICAL STUDIES OF CERVICAL VAGUS NERVE-STIMULATION IN HUMANS .1. EEG EFFECTS [J].
HAMMOND, EJ ;
UTHMAN, BM ;
REID, SA ;
WILDER, BJ .
EPILEPSIA, 1992, 33 (06) :1013-1020
[9]   FEASIBILITY AND SAFETY OF VAGAL-STIMULATION IN MONKEY MODEL [J].
LOCKARD, JS ;
CONGDON, WC ;
DUCHARME, LL .
EPILEPSIA, 1990, 31 :S20-S26
[10]  
Magnes J., 1961, ARCH ITAL BIOL, V99, P33