RESPONSE OF MACROINVERTEBRATES AND SMALL FISH TO NUTRIENT ENRICHMENT IN THE NORTHERN EVERGLADES

被引:55
作者
RADER, RB
RICHARDSON, CJ
机构
[1] Duke Wetlands Center, Loxahatchee, 33470, FL
[2] School of The Environment, Duke University, Durham, 27706, NC
关键词
NUTRIENT ENRICHMENT; EVERGLADES; INVERTEBRATES; FISH;
D O I
10.1007/BF03160629
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
The northern Everglades (Water Conservation Area 2A) annually receives an excess addition of 60 M tons of phosphorus and 1814 M tons of nitrogen from agricultural run-off. During 1990-91, invertebrates were collected from replicate sweep and core samples at eight sites along the nutrient enrichment gradient in Water Conservation Area 2A (WCA-2A). Species richness, Shannon's diversity, the number of unique species, and the density of invertebrates and small fish were all greater within enriched and intermediately enriched open water habitats than unenriched sloughs. Sorenson's taxonomic similarity index was significantly different between enriched and unenriched areas. Ostracods in particular were 14 times more abundant in the enriched area than at unenriched sites. The freshwater shrimp (Palaemonetes paludosus) was the only common species with lower densities in enriched than unenriched areas. However, the trophic structure or percent composition of grazers, predators, and collector-gatherers and the number of species within taxonomic orders and functional feeding groups was very similar among sites along the nutrient enrichment gradient. Higher invertebrate and small fish diversity and density within enriched sites indicates that nutrient enrichment has not caused direct harmful foodweb effects that may adversely influence higher trophic levels (e.g., wading birds). Assuming, however, that nutrients can cause cattails to overgrow and eliminate sloughs, the centers of biological diversity in the Everglades, then nutrient enrichment may have harmful indirect effects.
引用
收藏
页码:134 / 146
页数:13
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
Barber E., We need a balancing act, National Wetlands Newsletter, 13, pp. 5-6, (1991)
[2]  
Campbell-Mohn C., Will it save the Everglades?, National Wetlands Newsletter, 13, (1991)
[3]  
Cheal F., Davis J.A., Growns J.E., Bradley J.S., Whittles F.H., The influence of sampling method on the classification of wetland macroinvertebrate communities, Hydrobiologia, 257, pp. 47-56, (1993)
[4]  
Craft C.B., Richardson C.J., Peat accretion and N, P, and organic accumulation in nutrient-enriched and unenriched Everglades peatlands, Ecological Applications, 3, pp. 446-458, (1993)
[5]  
Davis S.M., Sawgrass and cattail production in relation to nutrient supply in the Everglades, Freshwater Wetlands and Wildlife. CONF-8603101, pp. 325-341, (1989)
[6]  
Davis S.M., Phosphorus inputs and vegetation sensitivity in the Everglades, Everglades: The Ecosystem and Its Restoration, pp. 357-378, (1994)
[7]  
Epler J.H., Identification manual for the larval Chironomidae (Diptera) of Florida, (1992)
[8]  
Gleason P., Environments of South Florida: Present and Past, (1974)
[9]  
Gleason P.J., Spackman W., Calcareous periphyton and water chemistry in the Everglades, Environments of South Florida, Present and Past, pp. 146-181, (1974)
[10]  
Hutcheson K., A test for comparing diversities based on the Shannon formula, Journal of Theoretical Biology, 29, pp. 151-154, (1970)