COMPARISON OF ULTRASOUND, CT, AND MR-IMAGING IN THE EVALUATION OF CANDIDATES FOR TIPS

被引:10
作者
KRAUS, BB
ROS, PR
ABBITT, PL
KERNS, SR
SABATELLI, FW
机构
[1] Department of Radiology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida, 32610-0374
来源
JMRI-JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING | 1995年 / 5卷 / 05期
关键词
TIPS; MRI; LIVER; PORTAL VEIN;
D O I
10.1002/jmri.1880050517
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
To compare ultrasound (US), CT, and MRI in the evaluation of hepatic vascular anatomy, portal and splenic venous flow, and collateral pathways (varices and spontaneous shunts) in candidates for transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunting (TIPS), 17 patients with history of refractory variceal bleeding or intractable ascites underwent duplex US, contrast-enhanced CT, and MRI before TIPS, The appearance of portal and hepatic anatomy was graded from 1 (not visible) to 4 (excellent visualization) independently by four radiologists, Presence and direction of portal and splenic venous now, and presence and location of varices and spontaneous portosystemic shunts were also assessed, Results and effects of interobserver variation were assessed for significance using Friedman's ANOVA and Wilcoxon's signed-rank test, MRI yielded higher scores than CT or US for hepatic veins (P<.0001) and inferior vena cava (P<.0001), MRI and CT scored better than US for portal vein branches (P=.012) and splenic vein (P=.0038), All tests demonstrated the main portal vein well, with no statistically significant difference, US and MRI were more sensitive than CT for detecting portal vein flow and direction (US 76%, CT 0%, MRI 82%), MRI was most sensitive for splenic vein flow and direction (US 41%, CT 0%, MRI 76%), CT and MRI were more sensitive than US in detecting varices (US 5%, CT 50%, MRI 58%) and spontaneous shunts (US 13%, CT 75%, MRI 75%), Interobserver variation did not influence results significantly P=.3691), MRI provides the most useful information and may be the preferred single imaging test prior to TIPS.
引用
收藏
页码:571 / 578
页数:8
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
Radosevich PM, Ring EJ, LaBerge JM, Et al., Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts in patients with portal vein occiusion, Radiology, 186, pp. 523-527, (1993)
[2]  
Honda M, Nishida H, Takashina T, Matsui S, Hashimoto T, Munechika H, A case of alcoholic liver cirrhosis associated with portal vein thrombosis which was successfully treated by TIPS, Nippon‐Igaku‐Hoshasen‐Gakkal‐Zasshi, 53, pp. 220-222, (1993)
[3]  
van-Leeuwen MS, Doppler ultrasound in the evaluation of portal hypertension, Clin Diagn Ultrasound, 26, pp. 53-76, (1990)
[4]  
Koslin DB, Mullinga SA, Berland LL, Duplex assessment of the portal venous system, Semin Ultrasound‐CT‐MR, 13, pp. 22-33, (1992)
[5]  
Takahashi M, Okawada T, Kato R, Et al., Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent shunt (TIPSS) with use of Rosch‐Uchida transjugular liver access set—evaluation by CT and its clinical application, Nippon‐Igaku‐Hoshasen‐Gakkai‐Zasshi, 52, pp. 1692-1694, (1992)
[6]  
Taylor CR, Computed tomography in the evaluation of the portal venous system, J Clin Gastroenterol, 14, pp. 167-172, (1992)
[7]  
Katz JA, Rubin RA, Cope C, Holland G, Brass CA, Recurrent bleeding from anorectal varices: successful treatment with a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt, Am J Gastroenterol, 88, pp. 1104-1107, (1993)
[8]  
Finn JP, Kane RA, Edelman RR, Et al., Imaging of the portal venous system in patients with cirrhosis: MR anglography vs duplex Doppler sonography, AJR, 161, pp. 989-994, (1993)
[9]  
Freund JE, Modern elementary statistics, (1984)
[10]  
Applied regression analysis and other multivariable methods, (1988)