Sets of Standards for External Quality Assurance Agencies: A comparison

被引:9
作者
Aelterman, Guy [1 ]
机构
[1] Accreditat Org Netherlands & Flanders NVAO, The Hague, Netherlands
关键词
Quality assurance; codes of practice; guidelines; operational standards; quality assurance agencies;
D O I
10.1080/13538320601050996
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The aim of quality assurance codes of practice and guidelines is, in theory, to give a clear indication to stakeholders, governments, financers, partners and the public at large about the various course providers and the level of education they offer. This paper compares six different quality assurance codes of practice and guidelines and uses the INQAAHE guidelines as a baseline. The paper investigates the extent to which there is a degree of transparency and comparability between the standards and criteria that are applied by the different networks. Overall, there appears to be considerable transparency and comparability between the codes of the major international networks of quality assurance agencies.
引用
收藏
页码:227 / 233
页数:7
相关论文
共 7 条
[1]  
ASIA-PACIFIC QUALITY NETWORK (APQN), 2006, MEMB CRIT
[2]  
ASSOCIATION OF SPECIALIZED AND PROFESSIONAL ACCREDITORS, 1995, ASPA MEM COD GOOD PR
[3]  
ENQA, 2005, STAND GUID QUAL ASS
[4]  
EUROPEAN ASSOCIATION FOR QUALITY ASSURANCE IN HIGHER EDUCATION (ENQA), 2006, GUID NAT REV ENQA ME
[5]  
EUROPEAN CONSORTIUM FOR ACCREDITATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION (ECA), 2004, COD GOOD PRACT
[6]  
INQAAHE, 2005, GUID GOOD PRACT
[7]  
OECD, 2005, GUID QUAL PROV CROSS