EFFECT OF ADDITION OF HYDROXYAPATITE ON THE PHYSICAL-PROPERTIES OF IRM

被引:14
作者
OWADALLY, ID [1 ]
FORD, TRP [1 ]
机构
[1] UNITED MED & DENT SCH,GUYS HOSP,DEPT CONSERVAT DENT SURG,LONDON SE1 9RT,ENGLAND
关键词
HYDROXYAPATITE; IRM; PHYSICAL PROPERTIES; RETROGRADE ROOT FILLING;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2591.1994.tb00260.x
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of adding 10% and 20% hydroxyapatite (HAP) to Intermediate Restorative Material (IRM) on physical properties such as working time, setting time, compressive strength and disintegration rate. The working and setting times were determined by an indentation method. The ISO recommended method was used to determine compressive strength. The rate of disintegration in vitro was evaluated in buffered sodium citrate at pH 4.5, 5.8, buffered phosphate at pH 7.0 and in bovine serum (pH 6.8), and examined using a replica method and scanning electron microscopy. Kalzinol and EBA were used as control materials for the disintegration experiment. IRM had longer mean working (4 min 43.5 s) and mean setting (6 min 28.5 s) times than IRM + 10 or 20% HAP (P<0.001), the mean reductions being 16% and 9% for IRM + 10% HAP, and 29% and 19% for IRM + 20% HAP, respectively. IRM had a greater compressive strength (68.5 MPa, P<0.01) than IRM + 10% HAP (65.0 MPa) or IRM + 20% HAP (60.0 MPa, P<0.001). Kalzinol, IRM + 10% HAP and IRM + 20% HAP were found to disintegrate after 8 weeks in buffered phosphate and in bovine serum. In contrast, IRM and EBA showed no noticeable signs of disintegration after 6 months in the same media. The physical properties of IRM + 10% HAP and IRM + 20% HAP were reduced compared with IRM but the reductions were not considered to be of clinical significance.
引用
收藏
页码:227 / 232
页数:6
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
Barnes IE, Replication techniques for the scanning electron microscope. 2. Clinical and laboratory procedures: interpretation, Journal of Dentistry, 7, pp. 25-37, (1979)
[2]  
Bondra DL, Hartwell GR, Macpherson MG, Portell FR, Leakage in vitro with IRM, high copper amalgam and EBA cement as retrofillings, Journal of Endodontics, 15, pp. 157-160, (1989)
[3]  
Brauer GM, Simon L, Sangermano L, Improved zinc oxide‐eugenol type cements, Journal of Dental Research, 41, pp. 1096-1102, (1962)
[4]  
Civjan S, Huget EF, Wolfhard G, Waddell LS, Characterization of zinc oxide‐eugenol cements reinforced with acrylic resin, Journal of Dental Research, 51, pp. 107-114, (1972)
[5]  
Coats JM, (1986)
[6]  
Dorn SO, Gartner AH, Retrograde filling materials: a retrospective success‐failure study of amalgam. EBA and IRM, Journal of Endodontics, 16, pp. 391-393, (1990)
[7]  
Fallon MD, Alteration in the pH of osteoclast resorting fluid reflects changes in bone degradative activity, Calcified Tissue International, 36, (1984)
[8]  
Gutmann JL, Harrison JW, Surgical Endodontics, pp. 252-255, (1991)
[9]  
Hendra LP, EBA cement. A practical system for all cementation, Journal of the British Endodntic Society, 4, pp. 28-31, (1970)
[10]  
Dental zinc oxide/eugenol cements and zinc oxide noneugenol cements, (1988)