COMPARISON OF SEVOFLURANE AND HALOTHANE ANESTHESIA IN CHILDREN UNDERGOING OUTPATIENT EAR, NOSE, AND THROAT SURGERY

被引:38
作者
GREENSPUN, JCF [1 ]
HANNALLAH, RS [1 ]
WELBORN, LG [1 ]
NORDEN, JM [1 ]
机构
[1] CHILDRENS NATL MED CTR,DEPT ANESTHESIOL,WASHINGTON,DC 20010
关键词
ANESTHESIA; PEDIATRIC; ANESTHETICS; VOLATILE; HALOTHANE; SEVOFLURANE; RECOVERY; AMBULATORY SURGERY;
D O I
10.1016/0952-8180(95)00071-O
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Study Objective: To compare the induction, maintenance, and recovery characteristics of sevoflurane and halothane in pediatric ambulatory patients undergoing adenoidectomy with or without myringotomies (BMTs). To compare the hemodynamic effects of the two drugs. Design: Open, randomized study. Setting: University-affiliated pediatric hospital. Patients: 39 ASA physical status I children aged 12 months to 12 years undergoing adenoidectomies with or without BMTs. Interventions: Patients were randomized to receive sevoflurane or halothane in 60% nitrous oxide (N2O) for induction and maintenance of anesthesia. All patients received midazolam 0.5 mg/kg orally as premedication, as well as fentanyl 1 mcg/kg intravenously (IV) immediately following induction. Tracheal intubation was facilitated with mivacurium 0.2 mg/kg IV. Anesthesia was maintained with an end-tidal concentration corresponding to 1 minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) of each drag until the end of surgery, at which time all anesthetic gases were discontinued simultaneously, Emergence (extubation), recovery (Steward score = 6), and discharge limes were compared among patients in both groups. Heart rate (HR) and mean arterial pressure were compared at predetermined intervals. Additional fentanyl was administered after full recovery was documented for an objective pain score of at least 6. Measurements and Main Results: Emergence from anesthesia was significantly faster (7.11 +/- 3.05 minutes vs. 9.58 +/- 5.12 minutes) and recovery (19.89 +/- 10.07 minutes vs. 31.08 +/- 9.81 minutes) more rapid in the sevoflurane group. However, there was no difference in the lime to meet home discharge criteria (184 +/- 49 minutes vs. 189 +/- 48 minutes). HR was consistently maintained at or above baseline in the sevoflurane group. Blood pressure was significantly more depressed after fentanyl administration in the halothane group. There were no significant differences in the incidence of postoperative vomiting between the two groups. Conclusion: Sevoflurane provides a faster anesthetic emergence and recovery than halothane in premedicated patients but it does not expedite meeting current home discharge criteria.
引用
收藏
页码:398 / 402
页数:5
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]  
Wallin, Regan, Napoli, Stern, Sevoflurane: a new inhalational anesthetic agent, Anesth Analg, 54, pp. 758-766, (1975)
[2]  
Strum, Eger, Partition coefficients for sevoflurane in human blood, saline, and olive oil, Anesth Analg, 66, pp. 654-656, (1987)
[3]  
Malviya, Lerman, The blood/gas solubilities of sevoflurane, isoflurane, halothane, and serum constituent concentrations in neonates and adults, Anesthesiology, 72, pp. 793-796, (1990)
[4]  
Kazama, Ikeda, Comparison of MAC and the rate of rise of alveolar concentration of sevoflurane with halothane and isoflurane in the dog, Anesthesiology, 68, pp. 435-437, (1988)
[5]  
Katoh, Ikeda, Minimum alveolar concentration of sevoflurane in children, Br J Anaesth, 68, pp. 139-141, (1992)
[6]  
Lerman, Robinson, Willis, Gregory, Anesthetic requirements for halothane in young children 0–1 month and 1–6 months of age, Anesthesiology, 59, pp. 421-424, (1983)
[7]  
Steward, A simplified scoring system for the post-operative recovery room, Can Anaesth Soc J, 22, pp. 111-113, (1975)
[8]  
Motoyama, Anesthesia for ear,nose, and throat surgery, Smith's Anesthesia for Infants and Children, (1990)
[9]  
Naito, Tamai, Shingu, Fujimori, Mori, Comparison between sevoflurane and halothane for pediatric ambulatory anaesthesia, Br J Anaesth, 67, pp. 387-389, (1991)
[10]  
Morisaki, Suzuki, Miyazawa, Kiichi, Misaki, Suzuki, A clinical trial of sevoflurane in children for herniorraphy, Jpn J Anesthesiol, 36, pp. 1996-1998, (1987)