THE EFFECT OF WINTER FEEDING LEVEL ON SUBSEQUENT GRAZING BEHAVIOR AND HERBAGE INTAKE OF CHAROLAIS HEIFERS

被引:9
作者
CAZCARRA, RF
PETIT, M
机构
[1] Laboratoire Adaptation des Herbivores aux Milieux, INRA de Theix-Clermont-Ferrand
来源
ANIMAL SCIENCE | 1995年 / 61卷
关键词
COMPENSATORY GAIN; GRAZING BEHAVIOR; HEIFERS; INTAKE;
D O I
10.1017/S1357729800013734
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Two groups of eight Charolais heifers were used to examine the effect of feeding level during the post-weaning winter on the grazing behaviour and herbage intake over three periods during the first 2 months of grazing. The winter diets (L and H) were given to achieve a mean difference of 50 kg between groups at turn-out. The heifers were set-stocked together on a hill pasture where sward height was maintained at 12 cm. The winter live-weight gains were 0.31 and 0.70 (s.e. 0.032) kg/day for L and H heifers respectively, and spring gains 1.94 and 1.66 (s.e. 0.082) kg/day respectively. Intakes increased throughout the spring grazing for both groups. Absolute intakes were lower for L than for H heifers only during the first period (P < 0.05). Intake pel kg live weight was higher in L than in H heifers (23.0 v. 21.1 (s.e. 0.54) g organic matter (OM) per kg live weight). Bite weights of H heifers were constant throughout (434, (s.e. 12.9) mg OM), while bite weights of L heifers only reached those of H heifers in the last period. Bite weight was linearly related to live weight. Bite rates were not different between groups, bur L heifers compensated for lower bite weight by grazing longer and the?, increased their grazing time after turn-out faster than H heifers. Grazing time was mainly responsible for higher relative intakes in L heifers, and thus, partly, for compensatory gain observed.
引用
收藏
页码:211 / 217
页数:7
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   DETERMINANTS OF HERBAGE INTAKE BY GRAZING SHEEP - INTERRELATIONSHIP OF FACTORS INFLUENCING HERBAGE INTAKE AND AVAILABILITY [J].
ALLDEN, WG ;
WHITTAKER, IA .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH, 1970, 21 (05) :755-+
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1988, SAS STAT USERS GUIDE
[3]  
ARNOLD GW, 1981, WORLD ANIMAL SCI B, V1, P79
[4]   COMPARISON OF METHODS FOR PREDICTING DIGESTIBILITY OF FEEDS [J].
AUFRERE, J ;
MICHALETDOREAU, B .
ANIMAL FEED SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1988, 20 (03) :203-218
[5]   THE EFFECT OF DIET IN WINTER ON THE BODY-COMPOSITION OF YOUNG STEERS AND SUBSEQUENT PERFORMANCE DURING THE GRAZING SEASON [J].
BAKER, RD ;
YOUNG, NE ;
LAWS, JA .
ANIMAL PRODUCTION, 1992, 54 :211-219
[6]  
BULICH SA, 1990, 7TH P EUR GRAZ WORKS
[7]  
CAZCARRA RF, 1995, IN PRESS ANIMAL PRES
[8]   FACTORS INFLUENCING THE ESTIMATION OF THE NUTRITIVE-VALUE OF THE DIET SELECTED BY CATTLE FISTULATED AT THE ESOPHAGUS [J].
COHEN, RDH .
JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE, 1979, 93 (DEC) :607-618
[9]  
COMERON EA, 1991, THESIS U RENNES FRAN
[10]  
ERLINGER LL, 1990, J ANIM SCI, V68, P3578