EXPERIENCE WITH THE MEMOTHERM(TM) PROSTATIC STENT

被引:12
作者
WILLIAMS, G
WHITE, R
机构
[1] Department of Surgery, Hammersmith Hospitals NHS Trust, Hammersmith Hospital, London
来源
BRITISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY | 1995年 / 76卷 / 03期
关键词
MEMOTHERM(TM) PROSTATIC STENT; BLADDER OUTFLOW OBSTRUCTION;
D O I
10.1111/j.1464-410X.1995.tb07710.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective To evaluate the Memotherm(TM) (Angiomed) permanently implantable prostatic stent. Patients and methods Forty-eight men (mean age 70.3 years, range 57-86) with symptoms and urodynamics suggestive of bladder outflow obstruction had a Memotherm(TM) stent inserted into the prostatic urethra. Subjective and objective follow-up was performed at 1, 3 and 6 months. Results All but one patient was eventually able to void. Ten stents have been removed and three patients are awaiting stent removal. Subjective benefits bore no correlation with the maximum urinary now rate and the findings on cystoscopy, Only 15 of the 48 patients had a satisfactory result. Conclusion Permanently implanted prostatic stents should be considered experimental and only marketed after intensive investigation. As a result of this study, the Memotherm(TM) stent is to undergo significant modifications.
引用
收藏
页码:337 / 340
页数:4
相关论文
共 4 条
[1]  
Williams G., Jaeger R., McLoughlin J., Et al., Use of stents for treating obstruction of urinary outflow in patients unfit for surgery, Br Med J, 298, (1989)
[2]  
Williams G., Coulange C., Milroy EJG, Sarramon JP, Rubben H., The UroLume, a permanently implanted prostatic stent for patients at high risk for surgery. Results from 5 collaborative centres, Br J Urol, 72, pp. 335-340, (1993)
[3]  
Guazzoni G., Montorsi F., Coulange C., Et al., A modified prostatic UroLume wallstent for healthy patients with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia. A European Multicentre Study, Urology, 44, pp. 364-370, (1994)
[4]  
Kaplan SA, Merrill DC, Mosley WG, Et al., The titanium intraprostatic stent: the United States experience, J Urol, 150, pp. 1624-1629, (1993)