BENEFICIAL EFFECT OF A LOW GLYCEMIC INDEX DIET IN TYPE-2 DIABETES

被引:183
作者
WOLEVER, TMS
JENKINS, DJA
VUKSAN, V
JENKINS, AL
BUCKLEY, GC
WONG, GS
JOSSE, RG
机构
[1] Department of Nutritional Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario
[2] Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, St Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario
[3] Department of Clinical Biochemistry, St Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario
关键词
DIABETES DIET; GLYCEMIC INDEX; BLOOD GLUCOSE CONTROL; CHOLESTEROL-C-PEPTIDE;
D O I
10.1111/j.1464-5491.1992.tb01816.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Low glycaemic index foods produce low blood glucose and insulin responses in normal subjects, and improve blood glucose control in Type 1 and well-controlled Type 2 diabetic patients. We studied the effects of a low glycaemic index diet in 15 Type 2 diabetic patients with a mean fasting blood glucose of 9.5 mmol l-1 using a randomized, crossover design. Patients were given pre-weighed diets (59% energy as carbohydrate, 21% fat, and 24 g 1000-kcal-1 dietary fibre) for two 2-week periods, with a diet glycaemic index of 60 during one period and 87 during the other. On the low glycaemic index diet, the blood glucose response after a representative breakfast was 29% less than on the high glycaemic index diet (874 +/- 108 (t SE) vs 204 +/- 112 mmol min l-1; p < 0.001), the percentage reduction being almost identical to the 28% difference predicted from the meal glycaemic index values. After the 2-week low glycaemic index diet, fasting serum fructosamine and cholesterol levels were significantly less than after the high glycaemic index diet (3.17 +/- 0.12 vs 3.28 +/- 0.1 6 mmol l-1, p < 0.05, and 5.5 +/- 0.4 vs 5.9 +/- 0.5 mmol l-1, p < 0.02, respectively. Urinary C-peptide excretion, as an index of insulin secretion, was 30% lower on the low than the high glycaemic index diet (2.05 +/- 0.30 vs 2.93 +/- 0.49 nmol mmol-creatinine-1; p < 0.02), urinary urea was reduced by 19% (347 +/- 27 vs 402 +/- 39 mmol 24-h-1; p < 0.025), consistent with enhanced colonic fermentation. These results suggest that low glycaemic index starchy foods may be beneficial in the treatment of Type 2 diabetes.
引用
收藏
页码:451 / 458
页数:8
相关论文
共 62 条
  • [1] Crapo PA, Insel J., Sperling M., Kolterman OG., Comparison of serum glucose, insulin and glucagon responses to different types of complex carbohydrate in noninsulin‐dependent diabetic patients, Am J Clin Nutr, 34, pp. 184-190, (1981)
  • [2] Krezowski PA, Nuttall FQ, Gannon MC, Billington CJ, Parker S., Insulin and glucose responses to various starch‐containing foods in type II diabetic subjects, Diabetes Care, 10, pp. 205-212, (1987)
  • [3] Jenkins DJA, Wolever TMS, Jenkins AL., Starchy foods and the glycemic index, Diabetes Care, 11, pp. 149-159, (1988)
  • [4] Brand JC, Colagiuri S., Crossman S., Allen A., Roberts DCK, Truswell AS., Low‐glycemic index foods improve long‐term glycemic control in NIDDM, Diabetes Care, 14, pp. 95-101, (1991)
  • [5] Collier GR, Giudici S., Kalmusky J., Wolever TMS, Helman G., Wesson V., Et al., Low glycaemic index starchy foods improve glucose control and lower serum cholesterol in diabetic children, Diabetes Nutr Metab, 1, pp. 11-19, (1988)
  • [6] Fontvieille AM, Acosta M., Rizkalla SW, Bornet F., David P., Letanoux M., Et al., A moderate switch from high to low glycaemic‐index foods for 3 weeks improves metabolic control of Type 1 (IDDM) diabetic subjects, Diabetes Nutr Metab, 1, pp. 139-143, (1988)
  • [7] Hollenbeck CB, Coulston AM, Reaven GM., Glycemic effects of carbohydrates: a different perspective, Diabetes Care, 9, pp. 641-647, (1986)
  • [8] Jenkins DJA, Ghafari H., Wolever TMS, Taylor RH, Barker HM, Fielden H., Jenkins AL, Bowling AC., Relationship between the rate of digestion of foods and postprandial glycaemia, Diabetologia, 22, pp. 450-455, (1982)
  • [9] Brand JC, Nicholson PL, Thorburn AW, Truswell AS., Food processing and the glycemic index, Am J Clin Nutr, 42, pp. 1192-1196, (1985)
  • [10] Thorburn AW, Brand JC, Truswell AS., Slowly digested and absorbed carbohydrate in traditional bushfoods: a protective factor against diabetes?, Am J Clin Nutr, 45, pp. 98-106, (1987)