EFFECT OF SYRINGE FILTER AND IV ADMINISTRATION SET ON DELIVERY OF PROPOFOL EMULSION

被引:9
作者
BAILEY, LC
TANG, KT
ROGOZINSKI, BA
机构
[1] Pharmaceutical Chemistry Dept., College of Pharmacy, State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08855
来源
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL PHARMACY | 1991年 / 48卷 / 12期
关键词
ADDITIVES; ANESTHETICS; DIPRIVAN; DRUG ADMINISTRATION RATE; FILTERS; INCOMPATIBILITIES; INJECTIONS; NEEDLES; POLYVINYL CHLORIDE; PROPOFOL; STABILITY; STORAGE; SURGICAL SUPPLIES;
D O I
10.1093/ajhp/48.12.2627
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Propofol emulsion was studied to determine the effects of filtration and of passage through an i.v. administration set on drug concentration. To study syringe filter effects, propofol emulsion samples (Diprivan Injection, 10 mg/mL) were discharged through either a 5-mm filtering needle or a standard needle. To determine the effects of the i.v. administration set on propofol delivery, a diluted dispersion containing approximately 2 mg/mL was prepared from propofol emulsion and 5% dextrose injection. This formulation was siphoned into a 6-foot length of administration set tubing, from which samples were withdrawn at 0, 30,60, and 120 minutes. Another 2-mg/mL diluted dispersion of propofol and 5% dextrose injection was placed in a glass reservoir and delivered through a 6-foot i.v. set at a rate of 1.75 mL/min, which corresponds to a low dosage rate of 0.05 mg . kg-1 . min-1. Samples of the effluent were collected at 0, 5, 10, 15, 30, 60, 90, and 120 minutes. Samples collected from all three tests were assayed by using high-performance liquid chromatography. The mean propofol concentrations in the filtered and unfiltered samples were 96.05% and 96.09% of label claim, respectively, after discharge through needles; the difference was not significant. In the static study of the i.v. tubing effects, a 31.54-34.74% loss of propofol occurred after 120 min. In the study of propofol flowing through the i.v. tubing, the concentration dropped slightly in the initial sample, which was taken after the propofol was placed in the tubing. The concentration remained essentially constant for the first hour and then declined, with an overall average loss of 7.70%. While use of a filtering needle does not cause a significant decrease in propofol concentration, plasticized polyvinyl chloride i.v. tubing used to administer the drug can cause a significant reduction, dependent on the rate of flow of the infusion.
引用
收藏
页码:2627 / 2630
页数:4
相关论文
共 7 条
[1]  
BAILEY LC, 1991, IN PRESS J PHARM BIO, P9
[2]  
BOX GEP, 1978, STATISTICS EXPT, P187
[3]   SORPTION OF DRUGS BY PLASTIC INFUSION BAGS [J].
ILLUM, L ;
BUNDGAARD, H .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICS, 1982, 10 (04) :339-351
[4]   INTERACTIONS BETWEEN DRUGS AND POLYVINYL-CHLORIDE INFUSION BAGS [J].
KOWALUK, EA ;
ROBERTS, MS ;
BLACKBURN, HD ;
POLACK, AE .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL PHARMACY, 1981, 38 (09) :1308-1314
[5]   KINETICS OF SORPTION OF IONIZABLE SOLUTES BY PLASTIC INFUSION BAGS [J].
KOWALUK, EA ;
ROBERTS, MS ;
POLACK, AE .
JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES, 1986, 75 (06) :562-570
[6]  
LINTNER C, 1985, REMINGTONS PHARM SCI, P1478
[7]  
1987, DIPRIVAN PACKAGE INS