THE POTENTIAL FOR VOLATILIZATION LOSSES OF APPLIED NITROGEN FERTILIZERS FROM NORTHERN IDAHO SOILS

被引:7
作者
HAMID, A
MAHLER, RL
机构
[1] Soil Science Division, University of Idaho, Moscow
关键词
D O I
10.1080/00103629409369043
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Up to 70% applied ammonium-based nitrogen (N) fertilizers can be lost by volatilization in agricultural soils. The purpose of this experiment was to determine the effects of fertilizer treatment, water potential, and time on volatilization losses in three northern Idaho soils under laboratory conditions maintained at 25-degrees-C. A completely randomized block factorial design with repeated measures (3 soils x 4 fertilizer treatments x 2 soil water potentials x 3 replications-measured at 0, 2, 4, 8, and 16 d) was utilized in this study. The four fertilizer treatments consisted of 200 kg N/ha applied as: (1) surface-applied ammonium nitrate (AN), (2) surface applied ammonium sulfate (AS), (3) surface applied urea (Ysur), and (4) incorporated urea (Uinc). Data were analyzed by SAS-GLM and Omega squared (omega2) values were used to identify the impact of each main effect and interaction. A 4-factor interaction of fertilizer treatment (NM x soil (SL) K water potential (WP) x time of incubation (IT), four-3 factor interactions, six-2 factor interactions and four main effects were found to be significant in this study. Due to the number of significant sources of variation, omega2 values were used to assess their relative importance. The soil x fertilizer treatment interaction accounted for 27.3% of the variation in this study. Nitrogen loss after 16 d of incubation from the Usur treatment was 37.8% in the Devoignes silt loam, 18.7% in the Santa silt loam, 4.9% in the Schnoorson silt loam. Volatilization of N from the Uinc and AS treatments was greater in the Devoignes silt loam than the Santa and Schnoorson soils. Conversely, differences in volatilization losses from AN were not observed among the three soils. Fertilizer treatment was the second most important factor accounting for 21.4% of the variability. Losses of 20.5, 2.6, 1.9, and 1.3% were observed for the Usur, Uinc, AS, and AN treatments, respectively. This study demonstrated that: (1) volatilization losses may be significant for surface applications.of urea on some Idaho soils; however, incorporation of urea will reduce this hazard, and (2) volatilization losses are minimal when AN and AS are the N fertilizer sources.
引用
收藏
页码:361 / 373
页数:13
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   EFFECT OF ENVIRONMENTAL-FACTORS ON AMMONIA VOLATILIZATION FROM A UREA-FERTILIZED SOIL [J].
BOUWMEESTER, RJB ;
VLEK, PLG ;
STUMPE, JM .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1985, 49 (02) :376-381
[2]  
ERNST J. W., 1960, SOIL SCI SOC AMER PROC, V24, P87
[3]  
Fenn LB., 1985, ADV SOIL SCI, V1, P123
[4]   EFFECTS OF SOIL DRYING ON AMMONIA VOLATILIZATION FROM SURFACE-APPLIED UREA [J].
FERGUSON, RB ;
KISSEL, DE .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1986, 50 (02) :485-490
[5]   AMMONIA VOLATILIZATION FROM SURFACE APPLICATIONS OF UREA IN THE FIELD AND LABORATORY [J].
HARGROVE, WL ;
KISSEL, DE .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1979, 43 (02) :359-363
[6]   FIELD-MEASUREMENTS OF AMMONIA VOLATILIZATION FROM SURFACE APPLICATIONS OF AMMONIUM-SALTS TO A CALCAREOUS SOIL [J].
HARGROVE, WL ;
KISSEL, DE ;
FENN, LB .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1977, 69 (03) :473-476
[7]  
Keeney D. R., 1982, AGRON MONOGR, V9, P643, DOI DOI 10.2134/AGR0NM0N0GR9.2.2ED.C33
[8]   AMMONIA VOLATILIZATION FROM NITROGEN FERTILIZERS SURFACE APPLIED TO NO-TILL CORN [J].
KELLER, GD ;
MENGEL, DB .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1986, 50 (04) :1060-1063
[9]  
Kirk RE, 1982, EXPT DESIGN PROCEDUR
[10]   GASEOUS LOSS OF AMMONIA FROM NITROGEN FERTILIZERS APPLIED TO SOILS [J].
KRESGE, CB ;
SATCHELL, DP .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1960, 52 (02) :104-&