SOIL COMPACTION AND MOISTURE STRESS PRECONDITIONING IN KENTUCKY BLUEGRASS .2. STOMATAL-RESISTANCE, LEAF WATER POTENTIAL, AND CANOPY TEMPERATURE

被引:13
作者
AGNEW, ML [1 ]
CARROW, RN [1 ]
机构
[1] KANSAS AGR EXPT STN, MANHATTAN, KS 66506 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2134/agronj1985.00021962007700060012x
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
In this greenhouse study we investigated the effects of soil compaction and moisture stress preconditioning on stomatal diffuse resistance (Rs), leaf water potential (.PSI.1), and canopy minus air temperatures (.DELTA.T) of Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis L. ''Ram I''). The compaction treatments were: (i) NC = no compaction, (ii) LT = long-term compaction over a 99-day period, and (iii) ST = short-term compaction for 9 days. The compactive treatment was equivalent to 720 J energy. Irrigation regimes were initiated at the same time as LT compaction and were: (i) well-watered = irrigation at -0.045 MPa and (ii) water-stressed = irrigation at =0.400 MPa. Ninety-nine days after initiation of preconditioning treatments, a dry-down cycle was started by watering each treatment to saturation. At this time, we monitored on a daily basis Rs, .PSI., and .DELTA.T. Under low soil O2, Rs remained low for 2 days and then increased over a 5-day period for all treatments, even though .PSI.1 did not change until the fifth day after irrigation (DAI). By DAI 9, Rs declined but then increased between DAI 10 to 13 as soil water potential (.PSI.s) and .PSI.1 decreased. As soil water deficits increased, plants preconditioned to LT compaction or water-stressed exhibited lower .PSI. (0.2 to 0.4 MPa), higher Rs and higher .DELTA. (1 to 2.degree. C) compared with uncompacted or well-watered plants. Regardless of the cause for higher Rs (i.e., low soil O2, LT compaction or water-stress preconditioning), the result would be lower photosynthesis and greater higher-temperature stress.
引用
收藏
页码:878 / 884
页数:7
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   SOIL COMPACTION AND MOISTURE STRESS PRECONDITIONING IN KENTUCKY BLUEGRASS .1. SOIL AERATION, WATER-USE, AND ROOT RESPONSES [J].
AGNEW, ML ;
CARROW, RN .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1985, 77 (06) :872-878
[2]  
AGNEW ML, 1984, THESIS KANSAS STATE
[3]  
Beard J.B., 1973, Turfgrass: Science and culture
[4]   CROP WATER DEFICITS [J].
BEGG, JE ;
TURNER, NC .
ADVANCES IN AGRONOMY, 1976, 28 :161-217
[5]  
BRADFORD KJ, 1981, HORTSCIENCE, V16, P25
[6]   A SCREEN-CAGED THERMOCOUPLE PSYCHROMETER AND CALIBRATION CHAMBER FOR MEASUREMENTS OF PLANT AND SOIL-WATER POTENTIAL [J].
BROWN, RW ;
COLLINS, JM .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1980, 72 (05) :851-854
[7]  
Cannell R. Q., 1977, Applied Biology Vol.II [Coaker, T.H. (Editor)]., P1
[8]   INFLUENCE OF SOIL COMPACTION ON 3 TURFGRASS SPECIES [J].
CARROW, RN .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1980, 72 (06) :1038-1042
[9]  
EHLER WL, 1978, AGRON J, V70
[10]   AFTER-EFFECT OF WATER STRESS ON STOMATAL OPENING POTENTIAL .1. TECHNIQUES AND MAGNITUDES [J].
FISCHER, RA ;
HSIAO, TC ;
HAGAN, RM .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY, 1970, 21 (67) :371-&