2ND-LOOK SURGERY IN THE MANAGEMENT OF EPITHELIAL OVARIAN-CARCINOMA

被引:18
作者
PODRATZ, KC
CLIBY, WA
机构
[1] Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation, Rochester
关键词
D O I
10.1006/gyno.1994.1351
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
The constructs for incorporating second-look surgery (SLL) in the treatment schema for ovarian epithelial carcinoma are being challenged. Although second-look surgery remains the hallmark for assessing disease status at the completion of adjuvant chemotherapy, its continued utility must demonstrate potential benefits in both the presence and absence of disease. While critics cite as unacceptable the recurrence rates (20-50%) after negative SLL, the patients so identified have demonstrated chemosensitivity and harbor optimal tumor volumes if present and possibly more biologically favorable tumors. These very characteristics should render negative SLL patients ideal candidates for consolidation therapy. Furthermore, age, histologic grade, and residual volume stratifies patients into high- and low-risk categories for recurrence after negative second look and should further facilitate consolidation therapy selection. Similarly, longevity following positive SLL is correlated adversely to advancing age and the histologic grade and the residuum of the tumor identified at reexploration. Recognizing that age and grade are predetermined factors, aggressive secondary cytoreduction has the potential of extending longevity. The latter is supported by mathematical tumor kinetic models and several focused, large, single-institution retrospective analyses. Therefore, the value of SLL is apparent but the criteria for its continued utilization in advanced ovarian cancer should include its performance by appropriately trained surgeons and the availability of (and preferably prospective trials for) both consolidation and salvage therapy to which all patients would optimally be afforded access. (C) 1994 Academic Press, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:S128 / S133
页数:6
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
ARHELGER SW, 1957, LANCET, V77, P412
[2]  
CHAMBERS SK, 1988, OBSTET GYNECOL, V72, P404
[3]   IMPROVED THERAPY WITH CISPLATIN REGIMENS FOR PATIENTS WITH OVARIAN-CARCINOMA (FIGO STAGE-III AND STAGE-IV) AS MEASURED BY SURGICAL END-STAGING (2ND-LOOK OPERATION) [J].
COHEN, CJ ;
GOLDBERG, JD ;
HOLLAND, JF ;
BRUCKNER, HW ;
DEPPE, G ;
GUSBERG, SB ;
WALLACH, RC ;
KABAKOW, B ;
RODIN, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1983, 145 (08) :955-967
[4]   2ND-LOOK LAPAROTOMY IN THE PATIENT WITH MINIMAL RESIDUAL STAGE-III OVARIAN-CANCER (A GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY GROUP-STUDY) [J].
CREASMAN, WT ;
GALL, S ;
BUNDY, BN ;
BEECHAM, J ;
MORTEL, R ;
HOMESLEY, HD .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 1989, 35 (03) :378-382
[5]  
EDMONSON JH, 1985, CANCER TREAT REP, V69, P1243
[6]   CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE-CISPLATIN VERSUS CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE-CARBOPLATIN IN STAGE-III-IV OVARIAN-CARCINOMA - A COMPARISON OF EQUALLY MYELOSUPPRESSIVE REGIMENS [J].
EDMONSON, JH ;
MCCORMACK, GM ;
WIEAND, HS ;
KUGLER, JW ;
KROOK, JE ;
STANHOPE, CR ;
EVERSON, LK ;
LAURIE, JA ;
EBBERT, LP ;
MALKASIAN, GD ;
ABUGHAZALEK, S ;
PODRATZ, KC ;
BARLOW, JF ;
WEILAND, LH .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1989, 81 (19) :1500-1504
[7]  
EINHORN N, 1978, CANCER, V41, P444, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(197802)41:2<444::AID-CNCR2820410210>3.0.CO
[8]  
2-8
[9]  
GERSHENSON DM, 1985, CANCER, V55, P1129, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19850301)55:5<1129::AID-CNCR2820550531>3.0.CO
[10]  
2-O