POSTOPERATIVE ANALGESIA FROM INTRATHECAL NEOSTIGMINE IN SHEEP

被引:84
作者
BOUAZIZ, H [1 ]
TONG, CY [1 ]
EISENACH, JC [1 ]
机构
[1] WAKE FOREST UNIV, BOWMAN GRAY SCH MED, DEPT ANESTHESIA, WINSTON SALEM, NC 27157 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1097/00000539-199506000-00012
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Spinal neostigmine produces analgesia in chronically prepared rats, but not in sheep. However, since pain itself activates bulbospinal inhibitory pathways, neostigmine may be more effective in the postoperative period. We examined in sheep the antinociceptive effect of intrathecal neostigmine in the acute postoperative period and determined the muscarinic receptor subtype activated by neostigmine. A cervical intrathecal catheter was inserted via a laminotomy in 14 sheep that then received, in random order 1 mg of spinal neostigmine or saline on postoperative Day 1 and the other injection on postoperative Day 2. Three additional sheep received, on separate days, intrathecal neostigmine alone or with the muscarinic receptor subtype-specific antagonists pirenzepine (Mi) 2 mg or AFDX-116 (M12) 2 mg. Antinociception was tested using a mechanical stimulus after each injection. Baseline withdrawal threshold did not change postoperatively. Intrathecal neostigmine, but not saline caused antinociception on both of the first two postoperative days. In contrast, intrathecal neostigmine caused no antinociception in another similar study performed at least 5 days after surgery. Pirenzepine, but not AFDX-116, abolished antinociception from neostigmine, suggesting an action on M1 subtype muscarinic receptors. Intrathecal neostigmine is antinociceptive in sheep during the acute postoperative period, and these data suggest that spinal cholinergic tone, and hence intrathecal neostigmine's analgesic effect, may be enhanced during the acute postoperative period.
引用
收藏
页码:1140 / 1144
页数:5
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [1] TOPOGRAPHY OF CHOLINE-ACETYLTRANSFERASE IMMUNOREACTIVE NEURONS AND FIBERS IN THE RAT SPINAL-CORD
    BORGES, LF
    IVERSEN, SD
    [J]. BRAIN RESEARCH, 1986, 362 (01) : 140 - 148
  • [2] BOUAZIZ H, 1995, IN PRESS REG ANESTH
  • [3] COUSINS MJ, 1984, ANESTHESIOLOGY, V61, P276
  • [4] DETWEILER DJ, 1993, JPHARM EXP THER, V365, P536
  • [5] DICKENSON A H, 1991, Journal of Psychopharmacology, V5, P342, DOI 10.1177/026988119100500424
  • [6] INTERACTIONS BETWEEN NORADRENERGIC AND CHOLINERGIC MECHANISMS INVOLVED IN SPINAL NOCICEPTIVE PROCESSING
    GORDH, T
    JANSSON, I
    HARTVIG, P
    GILLBERG, PG
    POST, C
    [J]. ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1989, 33 (01) : 39 - 47
  • [7] HARTVIG P, 1989, TRENDS PHARM SCI S, V10, P75
  • [8] DIFFUSE NOXIOUS INHIBITORY CONTROLS (DNIC) .1. EFFECTS ON DORSAL HORN CONVERGENT NEURONS IN THE RAT
    LEBARS, D
    DICKENSON, AH
    BESSON, JM
    [J]. PAIN, 1979, 6 (03) : 283 - 304
  • [9] DIFFUSE NOXIOUS INHIBITORY CONTROLS OF LUMBAR SPINAL NEURONS INVOLVE A SUPRASPINAL LOOP IN THE CAT
    MORTON, CR
    MAISCH, B
    ZIMMERMANN, M
    [J]. BRAIN RESEARCH, 1987, 410 (02) : 347 - 352
  • [10] TECHNIQUES FOR COMPARISON OF THERMAL AND MECHANICAL NOCICEPTIVE STIMULI IN THE SHEEP
    NOLAN, A
    LIVINGSTON, A
    MORRIS, R
    WATERMAN, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGICAL METHODS, 1987, 17 (01): : 39 - 49