THE MAGNITUDE OF GLOBAL INSECT SPECIES RICHNESS

被引:298
作者
GASTON, KJ
机构
[1] Biodiversity Division, Department of Entomology, The Natural History Museum, London, SW7 SBD, Cromwell Road
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1523-1739.1991.tb00140.x
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Recent suggestions that insects number tens of millions of species have received much attention. Little consideration, however, has been given to how such estimates compare with what else we know about insect species richness. Perhaps most significantly, the specialist knowledge of the taxonomic community at large has generally been ignored. Collation of published and unpublished information from this source provides little to encourage belief in truly vast numbers of undescribed species of insects. For the insect groups for which figures are available, estimates of global total numbers of species are typically less than ten times the numbers of described species. Although minimum global estimates are more readily constructed than upper estimates, these figures uniformly fail to support assertions that there are 30 million or more species of insects. Rather, a figure of less than ten million seems more tenable, and one of around five million feasible. Additional, more circumstantial, evidence tends to support the idea that insect species numbers may not be as vast as has been claimed. First, the contribution of canopy specialists to global richness may be less than often suggested. Second, a higher proportion of species than commonly entertained may have moderate to large geographic ranges. Third, the number of groups failing to increase in richness in the tropics may have been underestimated. Finally, the proportion of undescribed species encountered by many taxonomists seems insufficient to justify estimates of vast species numbers.
引用
收藏
页码:283 / 296
页数:14
相关论文
共 132 条
  • [1] Aagaard K., Hagvar S., Rare species of insects in Norway. 1. Mayflies, stoneflies, dragonflies, aquatic bugs, caddis flies, grasshoppers, ear‐wigs, lacewings, alder flies and scorpion flies. With introduction to the insect conservancy problems in Norway, Okoforsk Utred., 6, pp. 1-81, (1987)
  • [2] Abdul-Nour H., Comments about Hamilton's article: “The tenth largest family”, TYMBAL, 4, pp. 9-10, (1984)
  • [3] Achterbcrg, Essay on the phylogeny of Bra‐conidae (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea), Entomologisk Tid-skrift, 105, pp. 41-58, (1984)
  • [4] Ackery P.R., Vane-Wright R.I., Milkweed butterflies: their cladistics and biology, (1984)
  • [5] Adis J., Thirty million arthropod species–too many or too few, Journal of Tropical Ecology, 6, pp. 115-118, (1990)
  • [6] Alexander C.P., Alexander M.M., pp. 1-259, (1970)
  • [7] Alexander C.P., Byers G.W., Tipulidae, Manual of Nearctic Diptera, 1, pp. 153-190, (1981)
  • [8] Anderson N.M., The semiaquatic bugs (Hemiptera, Gerromorpha): phylogeny, adaptations, biogeography and classification, Entomonograph 3, (1982)
  • [9] Anderson S., Patterns of faunal evolution, Quarterly Review of Biology, 49, pp. 311-332, (1974)
  • [10] Arnett R.H., Present and future systematics of the Coleoptera in North America, Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 60, pp. 162-170, (1967)