Haemodiafiltration-optimal efficiency and safety

被引:63
作者
Ledebo, Ingrid [1 ]
Blankestijn, Peter J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Gambro Res & Dev, Lund, Sweden
[2] UMC Utrecht, Dept Nephrol, Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
convection; haemodiafiltration; on-line fluid preparation; postdilution; predilution;
D O I
10.1093/ndtplus/sfp149
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 [临床医学]; 100201 [内科学];
摘要
Haemodiafiltration (HDF) is the blood purification therapy of choice for those who want significant removal of uraemic solutes beyond the traditional range of small molecules. Combining diffusive and convective solute transport, a HDF treatment comprises the largest number of variables among blood purification therapies, and it is important to understand how they interact in order to optimize the therapy. This review discusses the parameters that determine the efficiency of HDF and how they can be controlled in the different forms of HDF and 'HDF-like' therapies practised today. The key to safe and effective HDF therapy is to have access to large volumes of high-quality fluids. Starting with ultrapure dialysis fluid, on-line preparation of a sterile, non-pyrogenic substitution solution can be made an integral part of the treatment, and we describe the necessary conditions for this. On-line HDF can provide the largest removal of the widest range of solutes among available dialysis therapies, and the potential clinical benefits of this are with in practical reach for the increasing number of patients dialysed with high-flux membranes and ultrapure dialysis fluid.
引用
收藏
页码:8 / 16
页数:9
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]
[Anonymous], 2002, NEPHROL DIAL TRANSPL, V17, P45
[2]
[Anonymous], 2005, EUROPEAN PHARMACOPOE
[3]
Pre-dilution on-line haemofiltration vs low-flux haemodialysis:: a randomized prospective study [J].
Beerenhout, CH ;
Luik, AJ ;
Jeuken-Mertens, SGJ ;
Bekers, O ;
Menheere, P ;
Hover, L ;
Klaassen, L ;
van der Sande, FM ;
Cheriex, EC ;
Meert, N ;
Leunissen, KM ;
Kooman, JP .
NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 2005, 20 (06) :1155-1163
[4]
Bhimani J. P., 2008, J AM SOC NEPHROL, V19, p460A
[5]
DIFFERENT BUFFERS FOR HEMODIAFILTRATION - A CONTROLLED-STUDY [J].
BIASIOLI, S ;
FERIANI, M ;
CHIARAMONTE, S ;
CAVALLINI, L ;
CESARO, A ;
FAZION, S ;
PETROSINO, L ;
PORENA, P ;
ZAMBELLO, A .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL ORGANS, 1989, 12 (01) :25-30
[6]
Bommer J, 1996, J AM SOC NEPHROL, V7, P883
[7]
Mortality risk for patients receiving hemodiafiltration versus hemodialysis: European results from the DOPPS [J].
Canaud, B. ;
Bragg-Gresham, J. L. ;
Marshall, M. R. ;
Desmeules, S. ;
Gillespie, B. W. ;
Depner, T. ;
Klassen, P. ;
Port, F. K. .
KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL, 2006, 69 (11) :2087-2093
[8]
Canaud B, 1985, Contrib Nephrol, V46, P184
[9]
Effects of high-flux Hemodialysis on clinical outcomes: Results of the HEMO study [J].
Cheung, AK ;
Levin, NW ;
Greene, T ;
Agodoa, L ;
Bailey, J ;
Beck, G ;
Clark, W ;
Levey, AS ;
Leypoldt, JK ;
Ornt, DB ;
Rocco, MV ;
Schulman, G ;
Schwab, S ;
Teehan, B ;
Eknoyan, G .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 2003, 14 (12) :3251-3263
[10]
Colussi Giacomo, 2007, Hemodial Int, V11, P76