INTENSIVE, DYNAMIC BACK-MUSCLE EXERCISES, CONVENTIONAL PHYSIOTHERAPY, OR PLACEBO-CONTROL TREATMENT OF LOW-BACK-PAIN - A RANDOMIZED, OBSERVER-BLIND TRIAL

被引:165
作者
HANSEN, FR
BENDIX, T
SKOV, P
JENSEN, CV
KRISTENSEN, JH
KROHN, L
SCHIOELER, H
机构
[1] Laboratory for Back Research, Medical Department, State University Hospital, Copenhagen
[2] Occupational Health Department, Scandinavian Airlines System, Kastrup
[3] Co-penhagen Community Hospital, Gentofte
关键词
LOW-BACK PAIN; CONTROLLED TRIAL; IDENTIFICATION OF SUBGROUPS; SEX; OCCUPATION; PHYSICAL WORK LOAD;
D O I
10.1097/00007632-199301000-00015
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
In a randomized, observer-blind trial, 150 men and women, aged 21-64 years, with chronic/subchronic low-back pain, followed one of these three treatment regimens: 1) intensive, dynamic back-muscle exercises; 2) conventional physiotherapy, including isometric exercises for the trunk and leg muscles; and 3) placebo-control treatment involving semihot packs and light traction. Eight treatment sessions were given during the course of 4 weeks, each session lasting 1 hour. The short-term effect was evaluated at the end of the treatment period and 1 month later, and the long-term effect at 6 and 12 months. The evaluations included recording of changes in pain level and assessment of overall treatment effect, which were indicated on visual interval scales. Subgroups of patients could be identified according to their treatment responses: physiotherapy was the superior treatment for the male participants, whereas the intensive back exercises appeared to be most efficient for the female participants. Patients with moderate or hard physical occupations tended toward a better response with physiotherapy, whereas intensive back exercises seemed most effective for those with sedentary/light job functions.
引用
收藏
页码:98 / 106
页数:9
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [1] Asmussen E., Heebфl-Nielsen K., Molbech S., Methods for evaluation of muscle strength, Communications from the Testing and Observation Institute of the Danish National Association of Infantile Paralysis, 5, pp. 3-13, (1959)
  • [2] Bendix A., Jensen C.V., Bendix T., Posture, acceptability and energy consumption on a tiltable and a knee-support chair, Clinical Biomechanics, 3, pp. 66-73, (1988)
  • [3] Bergquist-Ullmann M., Larsson U., Acute low back pain in industry: A controlled prospective study with special reference to therapy and confounding factors, Acta Orthop Scand, 170, pp. 1-117, (1977)
  • [4] Biering-Sфrensen F., Physical measurements as risk indicators for low-back trouble over a one-year period, Spine, 9, pp. 106-119, (1984)
  • [5] Burton A.K., Regional lumbar sagittal mobility: Measurement by flexicurves, Clinical Biomechanics, 1, pp. 20-26, (1986)
  • [6] Burton A.K., Tillotson K.M., Reference values for “normal” regional lumbar sagittal mobility, Clinical Biomechanics, 3, pp. 106-113, (1988)
  • [7] Cady L.D., Bishoff D.P., O'Connell E.R., Thomas P.C., Allan J.H., Strength and fitness and subsequent back injuries in firefighters, J Occup Med, 21, pp. 269-272, (1979)
  • [8] Coxhead C.E., Inskip H., Meade T.W., North W., Troup J., Multicentre trial of physiotherapy in the management of sciatic symptoms, Lancet, 1, pp. 1065-1068, (1981)
  • [9] Davies J.E., Gibson T., Tester L., The value of exercises in the treatment of low back pain, Rheumatolology Rehabilitation, 18, pp. 243-247, (1979)
  • [10] Deyo R.A., Walsh N.E., Martin D.C., Schoenfeld L.S., Ramamurthy S., A controlled trial of trans-cutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) and exercise for chronic low back pain, N Engl J Med, 322, pp. 1627-1634, (1990)