RESPONSE OF NP MUTANT OF PEA (PISUM-SATIVUM L) TO PEA WEEVIL (BRUCHUS-PISORUM L) OVIPOSITION AND EXTRACTS

被引:37
作者
DOSS, RP
PROEBSTING, WM
POTTER, SW
CLEMENT, SL
机构
[1] OREGON STATE UNIV, DEPT HORT, CORVALLIS, OR 97331 USA
[2] OREGON STATE UNIV, DEPT ZOOL, CORVALLIS, OR 97331 USA
[3] USDA ARS, CORVALLIS, OR 97331 USA
[4] USDA ARS, PULLMAN, WA 99164 USA
关键词
BRUCHUS BRACHIALIS; BRUCHUS PISORUM; COLEOPTERA; BRUCHIDAE; NEOPLASTIC PODS; PISUM SATIVUM; RESISTANCE;
D O I
10.1007/BF02033665
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The Np mutant of pea (Pisum sativum L.) is characterized by two physiological responses: growth of callus under pea weevil (Bruchus pisorum L., Coleoptera: Bruchidae) oviposition on pods, and formation of neoplastic callus on pods of indoor-grown plants. Although these two responses are conditioned by Np, they are anatomically and physiologically distinguishable, based on sites of origin, distribution pattern, and sensitivity to plant hormones. Further characterization of the response to extracts of pea weevil showed that response of excised pods, measured by callus formation, was log-linear, and treatment with as little as 10(-4) weevil equivalents produced a detectable response. Mated and unmated females contained similar amounts of callus-inducing compound(s), and immature females contained significantly less of the compound(s). Female vetch bruchids (Bruchus brachialis F., Coleoptera: Bruchidae), a related species, contained callus-inducing compound(s), but usually less than pea weevils on a per weevil basis. Males of both species contained less than 10% of the activity of the mature females. Extracts of female black vine weevils, a nonbruchid species, did not stimulate callus formation. Based on partitioning and TLC analysis, the biologically active constituent(s) was stable and nonpolar. Thus, the Np allele probably conditions sensitivity to a nonpolar component of pea weevil oviposition as a mechanism of resistance to the weevil.
引用
收藏
页码:97 / 106
页数:10
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
ANNIS B, 1984, ENTOMOL EXP APPL, V35, P83, DOI 10.1007/BF00343463
[2]  
Berdnikov V. A., 1992, PISUM GENET, V24, P37
[3]  
CLEMENT SL, 1992, ENTOMOL EXP APPL, V63, P115, DOI 10.1007/BF00343571
[4]   NEOPLASTIC POD IN PEA [J].
DODDS, KS ;
MATTHEWS, P .
JOURNAL OF HEREDITY, 1966, 57 (03) :83-&
[5]  
Esau K., 1977, Anatomy of seed plants.
[6]  
HARDIE D, 1993, THESIS U ADELAIDE
[7]  
HARDIE D, 1990, MAY P NAT PEA WORKSH, P72
[8]  
Hori K., 1992, P157
[9]   PHYSIOLOGICAL STUDIES ON A GENETIC TUMOR OF PISUM-SATIVUM-L [J].
JONES, JV ;
BURGESS, J .
ANNALS OF BOTANY, 1977, 41 (171) :219-&
[10]   GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENTAL STAGES OF ALASKA PEAS [J].
MEICENHEIMER, RD ;
MUEHLBAUER, FJ .
EXPERIMENTAL AGRICULTURE, 1982, 18 (01) :17-27