OPTIMIZATION OF THE MOUSE EAR SWELLING TEST FOR IN-VIVO AND IN-VITRO STUDIES OF WEAK CONTACT SENSITIZERS

被引:71
作者
GARRIGUE, JL
NICOLAS, JF
FRAGINALS, R
BENEZRA, C
BOUR, H
SCHMITT, D
机构
[1] HOP EDOUARD HERRIOT,PEAU HUMAINE & IMMUNITE,INSERM,U346,PAVILLON R,F-69437 LYON 03,FRANCE
[2] UNIV LOUIS PASTEUR,CHU STRASBOURG,DERMATOCHIM LAB,DERMATOL CLIN,F-67091 STRASBOURG,FRANCE
关键词
HAPTEN; CONTACT SENSITIVITY; MICE; MOUSE EAR SWELLING TEST; LYMPHOPROLIFERATIVE ASSAY;
D O I
10.1111/j.1600-0536.1994.tb00650.x
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Murine models for the assessment of the contact sensitizing properties of chemicals rely on mouse ear swelling tests (Mest), which are not sensitive enough to detect weak sensitizers. The aim of the present study was to develop in mice an adjuvant-free Mest appropriate for in vivo detection of any type of sensitizer (weak to strong), and useful for in vitro assessment of contact sensitivity (CS). 3 haptens were tested: dinitrochlorobenzene (DNCB), para-phenylenediamine (pPD) and isoeugenol. We compared various protocols for induction of the CS reaction, differing by the site of induction, the number of applications and the concentrations of the 3 haptens. Comparison of the induction site for optimal CS reaction showed that, in Balb/c mice, the back was a better site of induction than the abdomen. Detection of the sensitizing properties of weak sensitizers (pPD, isoeugenol) was possible using an adjuvant-free protocol, provided that the induction phase comprised hapten applications on 3 consecutive days on the backs of animals. For DNCB, one application was sufficient to obtain optimal CS reaction. For all 3 haptens, a secondary response in vitro was obtained using semi-purified lymph node T cells from animals sensitized 5 days before with the optimized Mest. These results demonstrate that the Mest could be a useful experimental model for the study of all types of contact sensitizers.
引用
收藏
页码:231 / 237
页数:7
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] TESTING FOR CONTACT ALLERGY IN EXPERIMENTAL-ANIMALS
    ANDERSEN, KE
    [J]. PHARMACOLOGY & TOXICOLOGY, 1987, 61 (01): : 1 - 8
  • [2] ASHERSON GL, 1968, IMMUNOLOGY, V15, P405
  • [3] THE VALUE OF THE LOCAL LYMPH-NODE ASSAY IN QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY INVESTIGATIONS
    BASKETTER, DA
    ROBERTS, DW
    CRONIN, M
    SCHOLES, EW
    [J]. CONTACT DERMATITIS, 1992, 27 (03) : 137 - 142
  • [4] A MURINE INVITRO MODEL OF ALLERGIC CONTACT-DERMATITIS TO SESQUITERPENE ALPHA-METHYLENE-GAMMA-BUTYROLACTONES
    BLASI, NA
    FRAGINALS, R
    LEPOITTEVIN, JP
    BENEZRA, C
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF DERMATOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 1992, 284 (05) : 297 - 302
  • [5] Buehler E.V., 1985, IMMUNOTOXICOLOGY IMM, P123
  • [6] COMPARISON OF A RADIOISOTOPIC INCORPORATION METHOD AND THE MOUSE EAR SWELLING TEST (MEST) FOR CONTACT SENSITIVITY TO WEAK SENSITIZERS
    CORNACOFF, JB
    HOUSE, RV
    DEAN, JH
    [J]. FUNDAMENTAL AND APPLIED TOXICOLOGY, 1988, 10 (01): : 40 - 44
  • [7] IDENTIFICATION OF CONTACT ALLERGENS - THE MOUSE EAR SENSITIZATION ASSAY
    DESCOTES, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TOXICOLOGY-CUTANEOUS AND OCULAR TOXICOLOGY, 1988, 7 (04): : 263 - 272
  • [8] Dooms-Goossens A, 1992, EUR J DERMATOL, V2, P465
  • [9] VARIABILITY OF A MOUSE EAR SWELLING TEST (MEST) IN PREDICTING WEAK AND MODERATE CONTACT SENSITIZATION
    DUNN, BJ
    RUSCH, GM
    SIGLIN, JC
    BLASZCAK, DL
    [J]. FUNDAMENTAL AND APPLIED TOXICOLOGY, 1990, 15 (02): : 242 - 248
  • [10] THE DISCRIMINATION BETWEEN NICKEL-SENSITIVE AND NON-NICKEL-SENSITIVE SUBJECTS BY AN INVITRO LYMPHOCYTE-TRANSFORMATION TEST
    EVERNESS, KM
    GAWKRODGER, DJ
    BOTHAM, PA
    HUNTER, JAA
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 1990, 122 (03) : 293 - 298