GENOTOXIC POTENTIAL OF ACEPHATE TECHNICAL - INVITRO AND INVIVO EFFECTS

被引:18
作者
CARVER, JH
BOOTMAN, J
CIMINO, MC
ESBER, HJ
KIRBY, P
KIRKHART, B
WONG, ZA
MACGREGOR, JA
机构
[1] LIFE SCI RES, EYE, SUFFOLK, ENGLAND
[2] LITTON BIONET INC, KENSINGTON, MD 20795 USA
[3] EG&G MASON RES INST, WORCESTER, MA 01608 USA
[4] MICROBIOL ASSOCIATES INC, BETHESDA, MD 20016 USA
[5] SRI INT, MENLO PK, CA 94025 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/0300-483X(85)90027-7
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
The genotoxic potential of acephate technical (AT) in vitro and in vivo was studied in bioassays detecting primary DNA damage, chromosomal alterations, and gene mutation. Results from in vitro assays have ranged from negative to weakly positive; AT is apparently a direct-acting agent in these tests. However, expressed in terms of molar potency, AT has generally been at least 100-1000 times less potent than known positive mutagens tested in vitro. Following in vivo exposure at maximum tolerated doses, AT did not induce chromosomal aberrations, sister chromatid exchange, or micronuclei in mouse bone marrow cells; a dominant lethal study in mice was also negative. In a supplemental study, no induced chromosomal aberrations or sister chromatid exchange could be detected in lymphocytes from a pair of cynomolgus monkeys following exposure to AT at a low dose level for 20 days. At dose levels limited by toxicity, no positive results were observed for induction of sex-linked, recessive lethality in Drosophila melanogaster. Acephate technical (ORTHENE) appears to present little or no genetic hazard to in vivo mammalian systems.
引用
收藏
页码:125 / 142
页数:18
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   SIMPLIFIED TECHNIQUE FOR INVIVO ANALYSIS OF SISTER-CHROMATID EXCHANGES USING 5-BROMODEOXYURIDINE TABLETS [J].
ALLEN, JW ;
SHULER, CF ;
MENDES, RW ;
LATT, SA .
CYTOGENETICS AND CELL GENETICS, 1977, 18 (04) :231-237
[2]   METHODS FOR DETECTING CARCINOGENS AND MUTAGENS WITH SALMONELLA-MAMMALIAN-MICROSOME MUTAGENICITY TEST [J].
AMES, BN ;
MCCANN, J ;
YAMASAKI, E .
MUTATION RESEARCH, 1975, 31 (06) :347-363
[3]   SISTER CHROMATID EXCHANGE AS AN INDICATOR OF MUTAGENESIS [J].
CARRANO, AV ;
THOMPSON, LH ;
LINDL, PA ;
MINKLER, JL .
NATURE, 1978, 271 (5645) :551-553
[4]   ESTIMATING MAXIMUM LIMITS TO MUTAGENIC POTENCY FROM CYTOTOXIC POTENCY [J].
CARVER, JH ;
HATCH, FT ;
BRANSCOMB, EW .
NATURE, 1979, 279 (5709) :154-156
[5]  
CARVER JH, 1983, SHORT TERM BIOASSAYS, V3, P229
[6]   LABORATORY PROCEDURE FOR ASSESSING SPECIFIC LOCUS MUTATIONS AT TK LOCUS IN CULTURED L5178Y MOUSE LYMPHOMA-CELLS [J].
CLIVE, D ;
SPECTOR, JFS .
MUTATION RESEARCH, 1975, 31 (01) :17-29
[7]  
Cohen M M, 1971, CHEMICAL MUTAGENS PR, V2, P515
[8]   DOMINANT LETHAL MUTATIONS IN MALE MICE [J].
EHLING, UH .
ARCHIVES OF TOXICOLOGY, 1977, 38 (1-2) :1-11
[9]   STANDARD PROTOCOL FOR DOMINANT LETHAL TEST ON MALE MICE - SET UP BY WORK GROUP DOMINANT LETHAL MUTATIONS OF AD HOC COMMITTEE CHEMOGENETICS [J].
EHLING, UH ;
MACHEMER, L ;
BUSELMAIER, W ;
DYCKA, J ;
FROHBERG, H ;
KRATOCHVILOVA, J ;
LANG, R ;
LORKE, D ;
MULLER, D ;
PEH, J ;
ROHRBORN, G ;
ROLL, R ;
SCHULZESCHENCKING, M ;
WIEMANN, H .
ARCHIVES OF TOXICOLOGY, 1978, 39 (03) :173-185
[10]   FACTORS INVOLVED IN DIFFERENTIAL GIEMSA-STAINING OF SISTER CHROMATIDS [J].
GOTO, K ;
MAEDA, S ;
KANO, Y ;
SUGIYAMA, T .
CHROMOSOMA, 1978, 66 (04) :351-359