RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SEA ICE FREEBOARD AND DRAFT IN THE ARCTIC BASIN, AND IMPLICATIONS FOR ICE THICKNESS MONITORING

被引:71
作者
WADHAMS, P
TUCKER, WB
KRABILL, WB
SWIFT, RN
COMISO, JC
DAVIS, NR
机构
[1] NASA, GODDARD SPACE FLIGHT CTR, WALLOPS FLIGHT FACIL, HYDROSPHER, WALLOPS ISL, VA USA
[2] NASA, GODDARD SPACE FLIGHT CTR, EG&G WASHINGTON ANALYT, WALLOPS FLIGHT FACIL, WALLOPS ISL, VA USA
[3] USA, CORPS ENGN, COLD REGIONS RES & ENGN LAB, HANOVER, NH 03755 USA
[4] NASA, GODDARD SPACE FLIGHT CTR, HYDROSPHER PROC LAB, GREENBELT, MD 20771 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1029/92JC02014
中图分类号
P7 [海洋学];
学科分类号
0707 ;
摘要
We have confirmed our earlier finding that the probability density function (pdf) of ice freeboard in the Arctic Ocean can be converted to a pdf of ice draft by applying a simple coordinate transformation based on the measured mean draft and mean elevation. This applies in each of six 50-km sections (north of Greenland) of joint airborne laser and submarine sonar profile obtained along nearly coincident tracks from the Arctic Basin north of Greenland and tested for this study. Detailed differences in the shape of the pdf can be explained on the basis of snow load and can, in principle, be compensated by the use of-a more sophisticated freeboard-dependent transformation. The measured ''density ratio'' R (actually mean draft/mean elevation ratio) for each section was found to be consistent over all sections tested, despite differences in the ice regime, indicating that a single value of R might be used for measurements done in this season of the year. The mean value [R] from all six sections is 7.89; on the assumption that all six values are drawn from the same population, the standard deviation is 0.55 for a single 50-km section, and thus 0.22 for 300 km of track. In attempting to infer ice draft from laser-measured freeboard, we would therefore expect an accuracy of about +/- 28 cm in 50 km of track (if mean draft is about 4 m) and about +/- 11 cm in 300 km of track; these accuracies are compatible with the resolution of predictions from numerical models. A simple model for the variability of R with season and with mean ice thickness gives results in reasonable agreement with observations. They show that although there is a large seasonal variability due to snow load, there is a stable period from November to April when the variability is chiefly dependent on the mean ice thickness alone. Thus, in principle, R can be mapped over the Arctic Ocean as a basis for interpreting survey data. Better field data are needed on the seasonal and spatial variability of three key quantities: area-averaged snow load, mean density of first-year and multiyear ice (including the effect of ridging with these two ice regimes), and density of near-surface water.
引用
收藏
页码:20325 / 20334
页数:10
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]  
AAGARD K, 1988, NOAA ERL PMEL82 US D
[2]  
ACKLEY SF, 1976, CRREL7618 ENG LAB US
[3]  
Barry R. G., 1989, ARCTIC SEAS, P1
[4]   SEA ICE MOTION AS A DRUNKARD WALK [J].
COLONY, R ;
THORNDIKE, AS .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-OCEANS, 1985, 90 (NC1) :965-974
[6]   TOP BOTTOM MULTISENSOR REMOTE-SENSING OF ARCTIC SEA ICE [J].
COMISO, JC ;
WADHAMS, P ;
KRABILL, WB ;
SWIFT, RN ;
CRAWFORD, JP ;
TUCKER, WB .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-OCEANS, 1991, 96 (C2) :2693-2709
[7]  
COMISO JC, 1990, J GEOPHYS RES, V95, P13593
[8]   EQUATIONS FOR DETERMINING THE GAS AND BRINE VOLUMES IN SEA-ICE SAMPLES [J].
COX, GFN ;
WEEKS, WF .
JOURNAL OF GLACIOLOGY, 1983, 29 (102) :306-316
[9]  
Gorshkov S. G., 1983, WORLD OCEAN ATLAS, V3
[10]  
Hibler III W. D., 1972, AIDJEX B, V13, P77