THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF QUI-TAM ACTIONS

[1] AMAR, 1989, U CHICAGO LAW REV, V56, P445

[2] AMAR, 1989, HARVARD LAW REV, V102, P717

[3] AMAR, 1989, U CHICAGO LAW REV, V56, P443

[4] AMAR, 1989, HARVARD LAW REV, V102, P688

[5] BELL, 1978, FORDHAM L REV, V46, P1049

[6] BELL, 1978, FORDHAM L REV, V46, P1057

[7] BERGER, 1969, YALE LAW J, V78, P825

[8] BERGER, 1969, YALE LAW J, V78, P816

[9] CARTER, 1987, BYU L REV, P719

[10] CHEMERINSKY, 1983, NOTRE DAME L REV, V58, P1006

[1] AMAR, 1989, U CHICAGO LAW REV, V56, P445

[2] AMAR, 1989, HARVARD LAW REV, V102, P717

[3] AMAR, 1989, U CHICAGO LAW REV, V56, P443

[4] AMAR, 1989, HARVARD LAW REV, V102, P688

[5] BELL, 1978, FORDHAM L REV, V46, P1049

[6] BELL, 1978, FORDHAM L REV, V46, P1057

[7] BERGER, 1969, YALE LAW J, V78, P825

[8] BERGER, 1969, YALE LAW J, V78, P816

[9] CARTER, 1987, BYU L REV, P719

[10] CHEMERINSKY, 1983, NOTRE DAME L REV, V58, P1006