TIME TO FLOWERING OF MUNG BEAN (VIGNA-RADIATA) GENOTYPES AND THEIR HYBRIDS IN RESPONSE TO PHOTOPERIOD AND TEMPERATURE

被引:22
作者
IMRIE, BC
LAWN, RJ
机构
[1] CSIRO Division of Tropical Crops and Pastures, The Cunningham Laboratory, St Lucia, Queensland 4067
关键词
D O I
10.1017/S0014479700018470
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Time to flowering of mung bean crops varies appreciably depending on the genotype, and the daylengths and temperatures prevailing during the period after sowing. Relatively little is known about the precise nature and inheritance of flowering responses to photoperiod and temperature. The combined effects of variations in these two factors on time to flowering were therefore evaluated in controlled environment studies on six genotypes and four F1 hybrids. The responses were examined for conformity with hypothesized linear models from which inferences might be made of the genetic control of flowering. The analyses suggest that all the genotypes and F1s tested were quantitative short day plants, with the possible exception of one line which may be day neutral. The analyses further suggest that time to flowering was influenced by four genotype-specific attributes: minimum time to flowering, critical photoperiod (Pc), responsiveness to photoperiod longer than Pc, and responsiveness to temperature. Among the genotypes tested, different values were observed for each attribute. In most instances, the values for the F1s were closer to one or other parent, indicating dominance rather than additive genetic effects. We conclude that, with several levels each, the four attributes provide the potential for a diversity of flowering response types within mung bean. Further, it should prove possible to manipulate the mung bean germplasm to obtain novel combinations of attributes, and thus to breed genotypes adapted to photothermal regimes not previously considered suitable for the crop. © 1990, Cambridge University Press. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:307 / 318
页数:12
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
AGGARWAL VD, 1977, EUPHYTICA, V26, P207, DOI 10.1007/BF00032086
[2]  
AHN CS, 1985, INT MUNGBEAN NURSERY
[3]  
Atherton J. G., 1987, MANIPULATION FLOWERI, P17, DOI DOI 10.1016/B978-0-407-00570-9.50007-7
[4]   PHOTOPERIOD RESPONSE IN MUNG-BEANS (VIGNA-RADIATA (L) WILCZEK) [J].
BASHANDI, MM ;
POEHLMAN, JM .
EUPHYTICA, 1974, 23 (03) :691-697
[5]  
Fery R. L., 1982, Horticultural Reviews, V2, P311, DOI 10.1002/9781118060759.ch7
[6]  
GATES CT, 1970, CSIRO6 DIV TROP PAST
[7]  
Imrie B. C., 1988, Mungbean. Proceedings of the Second International Symposium held at Bangkok, Thailand, 16-20 November 1987., P146
[8]  
Lawn R.J., 1985, GRAIN LEGUME CROPS, P584
[9]   AGRONOMIC STUDIES ON VIGNA SPP IN SOUTHEASTERN QUEENSLAND .1. PHENOLOGICAL RESPONSE OF CULTIVARS TO SOWING DATE [J].
LAWN, RJ .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH, 1979, 30 (05) :855-870
[10]  
LAWN RJ, 1990, UNPUB FIELD CROPS RE