DISCORDANT MORPHOLOGIC FEATURES IN BONE-MARROW INVOLVEMENT BY MALIGNANT-LYMPHOMAS - USE OF GENE REARRANGEMENT PATTERNS FOR DIAGNOSIS

Discordant morphology between lymph node or extra-nodal site and bone marrow (BM) involvement by non-Hodgkin's malignant lymphoma (NHL) is a common occurrence, causing diagnostic difficulties, Additional diagnostic problems are posed by lymphoid aggregates commonly found in the BM of elderly patients, the age group with the highest incidence of lymphoma, Morphologic features are used to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions but no feature is diagnostic and exceptions are numerous, Immunophenotyping is helpful for detecting B cell monoclonality, but it cannot detect T cell monoclonality. Unique B and T cell gene rearrangement patterns, the molecular ''signature'' of the lymphoma, can be used to detect monoclonal lymphoid populations, Finding the same rearrangement pattern in the BM as in the primary mass is proof of BM involvement by the same clone of malignant cells, We used B/T and Bcl-2 gene rearrangements to help diagnose cases with discordant morphology between primary site and BM, One hundred and seventy-five specimens, obtained from patients undergoing staging or restaging for NHL, were analyzed for B/T cell and Bcl-2 gene rearrangements by multiple restriction endonuclease digestion and Southern hybridization with P-32 labeled J(H), J(K), C-T beta, and Bcl-2 probes, Forty-two specimens (24%) from 24 patients showed discordant morphology: of 13 specimens with atypical lymphoid aggregates, only one had a cell gene rearrangement; of 15 specimens with morphologically benign lymphoid aggregates, one demonstrated a cell gene rearrangement; and of 14 specimens positive for NHL with different morphology than the lymph node, 13 were positive for B cell gene rearrangements. Molecular analysis can aid in the diagnosis of NHL, can establish a ''baseline'' for detection of recurrence, and is useful in monitoring therapy, These data suggest that it is also a tool for the pathologist in cases of discordant morphology between the primary tumor and BM, and should be strongly considered for each site. (C) 1995 Wiley-Liss, Inc.