LATE EFFECTS OF HYPERFRACTIONATED RADIOTHERAPY FOR ADVANCED HEAD AND NECK-CANCER - LONG-TERM FOLLOW-UP RESULTS OF RTOG-83-13

被引:65
作者
FU, KK
PAJAK, TF
MARCIAL, VA
ORTIZ, HG
ROTMAN, M
ASBELL, SO
COIA, LR
VORA, NL
BYHARDT, R
RUBIN, P
SORGEN, SD
COX, JD
STETZ, J
机构
[1] RADIAT THERAPY ONCOL GRP,PHILADELPHIA,PA
[2] UNIV PUERTO RICO,RIO PIEDRAS,PR 00931
[3] SUNY HLTH SCI CTR,BROOKLYN,NY 11203
[4] ALBERT EINSTEIN MED CTR,PHILADELPHIA,PA 19141
[5] FOX CHASE CANC CTR,PHILADELPHIA,PA 19111
[6] CITY HOPE NATL MED CTR,DUARTE,CA 91010
[7] MED COLL WISCONSIN,MILWAUKEE,WI 53226
[8] UNIV ROCHESTER,ROCHESTER,NY 14627
[9] SACRAMENTO RADIAT ONCOL CTR,SACRAMENTO,CA
[10] UNIV TEXAS,MD ANDERSON CANC CTR,HOUSTON,TX 77030
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS | 1995年 / 32卷 / 03期
关键词
HEAD AND NECK CANCER; HYPERFRACTIONATION; LATE EFFECTS;
D O I
10.1016/0360-3016(95)00080-I
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: The objective of this study was to examine the incidence of late effects of hyperfractionated radiotherapy for head and neck cancer as a function of the dose delivered, as well as the daily interfraction interval. In addition, we wished to examine the influence of other prognostic factors including age, gender, primary site, T- and N-stage, and overall stage on the late effects of hyperfractionated radiotherapy. Methods and Materials: Between 1983 and 1987, 479 patients with advanced head and neck cancer were entered on a Phase I-LE/II dose escalation trial of hyperfractionated radiotherapy. They were randomly assigned to receive a dose of 67.2, 72.0, 76.8, or 81.6 Gy, delivered at 1.2 Gy/fraction, twice a day (BID), 5 days/week. Of the 451 analyzable patients, 399 patients who received greater than or equal to 64.8 Gy and had a follow-up > 90 days were eligible for this study. Acute and late effects were scored with the RTOG/EORTC late radiation morbidity scoring scheme. For this analysis, patients were subclassified by the actual doses delivered and by an average daily interfraction interval of less than or equal to 4.5 h or > 4.5 h. The incidence of late effects was estimated using a cumulative incidence approach. Results: Fifty-nine patients received 67.2 +/- 2.4 Gy, 119 received 72.0 +/- 2.4 Gy, 98 received 76.8 +/- 2.4 Gy, and 123 received 81.6 +/- 2.4 Gy. The proportion of patients treated with a daily interfraction interval of > 4.5 h was 32, 50, 43, and 71%, respectively. The four treatment groups were well balanced with respect to pretreatment characteristics. The median follow-up was 1.71 years (range: 0.24-9.6) for all evaluable patients and 6.12 years for 85 alive patients. There was no significant difference in the incidence of late effects between the different dose levels. At 5 years, the cumulative incidence of late effects was 17, 14, 20, and 13% for grade 3, and 7, 3, 7, and 5% for grade 4. However, the incidence of late effects differed significantly with respect to daily interfraction interval. The cumulative incidence of grade 4 late effects increased from 6.3% at 2 years to 7.5% at 3 years to 8.0% at 4 years and 8.6% at 5 years with an interval of less than or equal to 4.5 h, while it remained at a constant of 2.0% with an interval of > 4.5 h during the same period (p = 0.0036). Multivariate analysis showed that among the prognostic factors examined, daily interfraction interval of less than or equal to 4.5 h was the only significant independent prognostic factor for the development of grade 3+ or grade 4 late effects (p = 0.0167 and p = 0.0013, respectively). Conclusion: Results of this randomized Phase I-LE/II trial of hyperfractionated radiotherapy in head and neck cancer showed no apparent dose-response relationship for late effects within the range of 67.2-81.6 Gy. Daily interfraction interval was a significant independent factor for the development of late effects in a multivariate analysis.
引用
收藏
页码:577 / 588
页数:12
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
ANG KK, 1994, PRINCIPLES PRACTICE, V8, P1
[2]  
Bentzen, 1994, Semin Radiat Oncol, V4, P68, DOI 10.1016/S1053-4296(05)80034-7
[3]   INFLUENCE OF CIGARETTE-SMOKING ON THE EFFICACY OF RADIATION-THERAPY IN HEAD AND NECK-CANCER [J].
BROWMAN, GP ;
WONG, G ;
HODSON, I ;
SATHYA, J ;
RUSSELL, R ;
MCALPINE, L ;
SKINGLEY, P ;
LEVINE, MN .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1993, 328 (03) :159-163
[4]   ANALYSIS OF THE PROBABILITY AND RISK OF CAUSE-SPECIFIC FAILURE [J].
CAPLAN, RJ ;
PAJAK, TF ;
COX, JD .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1994, 29 (05) :1183-1186
[5]   INTERFRACTION INTERVAL IS A MAJOR DETERMINANT OF LATE EFFECTS, WITH HYPERFRACTIONATED RADIATION-THERAPY OF CARCINOMAS OF UPPER RESPIRATORY AND DIGESTIVE TRACTS - RESULTS FROM RADIATION-THERAPY ONCOLOGY GROUP PROTOCOL 8313 [J].
COX, JD ;
PAJAK, TF ;
MARCIAL, VA ;
COIA, L ;
MOHIUDDIN, M ;
FU, KK ;
SELIM, H ;
RUBIN, P ;
ORTIZ, H .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1991, 20 (06) :1191-1195
[6]  
COX JD, 1992, CANCER, V69, P2744, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19920601)69:11<2744::AID-CNCR2820691119>3.0.CO
[7]  
2-U
[8]   DOSE-RESPONSE FOR LOCAL-CONTROL WITH HYPERFRACTIONATED RADIATION-THERAPY IN ADVANCED CARCINOMAS OF THE UPPER AERODIGESTIVE TRACTS - PRELIMINARY-REPORT OF RADIATION-THERAPY ONCOLOGY GROUP PROTOCOL 83-13 [J].
COX, JD ;
PAJAK, TF ;
MARCIAL, VA ;
HANKS, GE ;
MOHIUDDIN, M ;
FU, KK ;
BYHARDT, RW ;
RUBIN, P .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1990, 18 (03) :515-521
[9]   RANDOMIZED DOSE-SEARCHING PHASE ILE/II TRIALS OF FRACTIONATION IN RADIATION-THERAPY FOR CANCER [J].
DIENERWEST, M ;
PAJAK, TF ;
BAUER, M ;
COX, JD .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1991, 83 (15) :1065-1071
[10]   HYPERFRACTIONATION VERSUS CONVENTIONAL FRACTIONATION IN OROPHARYNGEAL CARCINOMA - FINAL ANALYSIS OF A RANDOMIZED TRIAL OF THE EORTC COOPERATIVE GROUP OF RADIOTHERAPY [J].
HORIOT, JC ;
LEFUR, R ;
NGUYEN, T ;
CHENAL, C ;
SCHRAUB, S ;
ALFONSI, S ;
GARDANI, G ;
VANDENBOGAERT, W ;
DANCZAK, S ;
BOLLA, M ;
VANGLABBEKE, M ;
DEPAUW, M .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 1992, 25 (04) :231-241