ACCURATE ASSESSMENT OF PRECISION ERRORS - HOW TO MEASURE THE REPRODUCIBILITY OF BONE DENSITOMETRY TECHNIQUES

被引:1101
作者
GLUER, CC [1 ]
BLAKE, G [1 ]
LU, Y [1 ]
BLUNT, BA [1 ]
JERGAS, M [1 ]
GENANT, HK [1 ]
机构
[1] GUYS HOSP,DEPT NUCL MED,LONDON SE1 9RT,ENGLAND
关键词
BONE DENSITOMETRY; HETEROSCEDASTICITY; PRECISION ERROR; REPRODUCIBILITY; STATISTICS;
D O I
10.1007/BF01774016
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Assessment of precision errors in bone mineral densitometry is important for characterization of a technique's ability to detect logitudinal skeletal changes. Short-term and long-term precision errors should be calculated as root-mean-square (RMS) averages of standard deviations of repeated measurements (SD) and standard errors of the estimate of changes in bone density with time (SEE), respectively. Inadequate adjustment for degrees of freedom and use of arithmetic means instead of RMS averages may cause underestimation of true imprecision by up to 41% and 25% (for duplicate measurements), respectively. Calculation of confidence intervals of precision errors based on the number of repeated measurements and the number of subjects assessed serves to characterize limitations of precision error assessments. Provided that precision error are comparable across subjects, examinations with a total of 27 degrees of freedom result in an upper 90% confidence limit of +30% of the mean precision error, a level considered sufficient for characterizing technique imprecision. We recommend three (or four) repeated measurements per individual in a subject group of at least 14 individuals to characterize short-term (or longterm) precision of a technique.
引用
收藏
页码:262 / 270
页数:9
相关论文
共 19 条
  • [1] Nilas L., Christiansen C.C., Rates of bone loss in normal women: evidence of accelerated trabecular bone loss after the menopause, Eur J Clin Invest, 18, pp. 529-34, (1988)
  • [2] Block J., Smith R., Gluer C.C., Et al., Models of spinal trabecular bone loss as determined by quantitative computed tomography, J Bone Miner Res, 4, pp. 249-57, (1989)
  • [3] Kalender W.A., Felsenberg D., Louis O., Et al., Reference values for trabecular and cortical vertebral bone density in single and dual-energy quantitative computed tomography, Eur J Radiol, 9, pp. 75-80, (1989)
  • [4] Harris S., Dawson-Hughes B., Rates of change in bone mineral density of the spine, heel, femoral neck, and radius in healthy postmenopausal women, Bone Miner, 17, pp. 87-95, (1992)
  • [5] Davis J.W., Ross P.D., Wasnich R.D., MacLean C.J., Vogel J.M., Long-term precision of bone loss rate measurements among postmenopausal women, Calcif Tissue Int, 48, pp. 311-8, (1991)
  • [6] Pacifici R., Rupich R., Vered I., Et al., Dual energy radiography (DER): a preliminary comparative study, Calcif Tissue Int, 43, pp. 189-91, (1988)
  • [7] Gluer C.C., Steiger P., Selvidge R., Et al., Comparative assessment of dual-photon-absorptiometry and dual-energy-radiography, Radiology, 174, pp. 223-8, (1990)
  • [8] Steiger P., Block J.E., Steiger S., Et al., Spinal bone mineral density by quantitative computed tomography: effect of region of interest, vertebral level, and technique, Radiology, 175, pp. 537-43, (1990)
  • [9] Lilley J., Walters B.G., Heath D.A., Drolc Z., In vivo and in vitro precision of bone density measured by dual-energy x-ray absorption, Osteoporosis Int, 1, pp. 141-6, (1991)
  • [10] Schneider P., Borner W., Mazess R.B., Barden H., The relationship of peripheral to axial bone density, Bone Miner, 4, pp. 279-87, (1988)