ALLOCATION AND THE TRANSIENT DYNAMICS OF SUCCESSION ON POOR SOILS

被引:189
作者
GLEESON, SK [1 ]
TILMAN, D [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV MINNESOTA, DEPT ECOL EVOLUT & BEHAV, 318 CHURCH ST SE, MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55455 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2307/1937382
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Biomass and N allocation to leaf, root, stem and reproduction was determined in a 35-field chronosequence that spans the first 60 yr of secondary succession on a Minnesota sand plain. Biomass in leaf and root increased during succession, but reproductive biomass declined, and that in stem remained constant. Because root biomass increased twice as rapidly as leaf biomass, the proportion of total biomass in root increased during succession, whereas that in leaf, reproduction, and stem declined. Biomass allocation was determined on a species-by-species basis for 46 species common at different times during succession. This showed a similar pattern of increasing proportional root allocation and declining proportional reproductive and stem allocation during succession. These changes were accompanied by an increase in total soil N and a decrease in light penetration to the soil surface during succession. Increasing root allocation and decreasing reproductive allocation suggest that succession on these nutrient-poor soils is the transient dynamics of colonization and competitive displacement, with later successional species being superior N competitors because of higher root allocation. Allocation trade-offs between root stem, leaf and seed can lead to initial dominance by species with high seed and leaf allocation, presumably because of greater colonization and/or maximal growth rates. Thus, this succession differs markedly from successions on rich soils, for which stem allocation is increasingly important. -from Authors
引用
收藏
页码:1144 / 1155
页数:12
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]   PATTERNS OF RESOURCE-ALLOCATION IN WILDFLOWER POPULATIONS OF FIELDS AND WOODS [J].
ABRAHAMSON, WG .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY, 1979, 66 (01) :71-79
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1982, WORLD FOREST BIOMASS
[3]   PHYSIOLOGICAL ECOLOGY OF PLANT SUCCESSION [J].
BAZZAZ, FA .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF ECOLOGY AND SYSTEMATICS, 1979, 10 :351-371
[4]  
BILLINGS W. D., 1938, ECOL MONOGR, V8, P437, DOI 10.2307/1943541
[5]   RESOURCE LIMITATION IN PLANTS - AN ECONOMIC ANALOGY [J].
BLOOM, AJ ;
CHAPIN, FS ;
MOONEY, HA .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF ECOLOGY AND SYSTEMATICS, 1985, 16 :363-392
[6]   THE MINERAL-NUTRITION OF WILD PLANTS [J].
CHAPIN, FS .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF ECOLOGY AND SYSTEMATICS, 1980, 11 :233-260
[7]   CONVERGENCE DURING SECONDARY FOREST SUCCESSION [J].
CHRISTENSEN, NL ;
PEET, RK .
JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY, 1984, 72 (01) :25-36
[8]   SECONDARY SUCCESSION, GAP DYNAMICS, AND COMMUNITY STRUCTURE IN A SOUTHERN APPALACHIAN COVE FOREST [J].
CLEBSCH, EEC ;
BUSING, RT .
ECOLOGY, 1989, 70 (03) :728-735
[9]   MECHANISMS OF SUCCESSION IN NATURAL COMMUNITIES AND THEIR ROLE IN COMMUNITY STABILITY AND ORGANIZATION [J].
CONNELL, JH ;
SLATYER, RO .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 1977, 111 (982) :1119-1144
[10]   The recent ecological history of Glacier Bay, Alaska: II. The present vegetation cycle [J].
Cooper, WS .
ECOLOGY, 1923, 4 :223-246