INFLUENCES ON COMMUTER TRIP DEPARTURE TIME DECISIONS IN SINGAPORE

被引:50
作者
CHIN, ATH
机构
[1] Department of Economics and Statistics, National University of Singapore
关键词
D O I
10.1016/0191-2607(90)90045-8
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper provides empirical evidence to support the widely held view that institutional factors such as official work start times and staggered working hours are powerful policy tools in traffic management and in influencing travel behaviour. This approach is to be preferred over continued investment in infrastructure given the scarcity of land in Singapore. A more efficient use of existing infrastructure could be achieved by spreading peak travel. Full utilisation of the Mass Rapid Transit will depend on changing the commuter's perception on multi mode travel in addition to using public transport. While many studies have been carried out on modal choice, research on commuter trip departure decisions have been few and remain largely least understood. This paper employs multinomial logit and simultaneous nested logit analysis to model the choice of departure time (using household data collected in Singapore in 1983). Preliminary findings show that schedule delay, travel cost, and journey time to be important influences on commuter's choice of trip departure time to work. Some difficulties are highlighted and suggestions for further research are made. © 1990.
引用
收藏
页码:321 / 333
页数:13
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   AN ANALYSIS OF THE COMMUTER DEPARTURE TIME DECISION [J].
ABKOWITZ, MD .
TRANSPORTATION, 1981, 10 (03) :283-297
[2]  
ATKINSON ST, 1979, J ECONOMETRICS, V1, P13
[3]  
BLUMSTEIN A, 1982, TRANSPORTATION, V11, P361
[4]  
BOERSCHSUPAN A, 1984, THESIS MIT CAMBRIDGE
[5]  
BOLTON JH, 1971, FLEXIBLE WORKING HOU
[6]  
CHIN TH, 1989, THESIS MACQUARIE U S
[7]  
CLARKE MI, 1985, INT C BEHAVIOURAL TR
[8]  
GRANGER CWJ, 1979, J ECONOMETRICS, V9, P13
[9]  
HENDRICKS C, 1979, J ECONOMETRICA, V9, P33
[10]   THE FLEXIBILITY OF DEPARTURE TIMES FOR WORK TRIPS [J].
HENDRICKSON, C ;
PLANK, E .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART A-POLICY AND PRACTICE, 1984, 18 (01) :25-36